Finite group having at least two conjugacy classes of involutions has order less than the cube of the maximum of orders of centralizers of involutions: Difference between revisions
(→Proof) |
(→Proof) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
'''Proof''': | '''Proof''': | ||
{| class="sortable" border="1" | |||
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Facts used !! Given data used !! Previous steps used !! Explanation | |||
|- | |||
| 1 || Let <math>x</math> be an involution of <math>G</math> such that <math>|C_G(x)|</math> has order <math>h</math> and let <math>C = C_G(x)</math>. || || definition of <math>h</math> || || Note that <math>x</math> exists by the definition of <math>h</math>. | |||
|- | |||
| 2 || Let <math>y</math> be an involution of <math>G</math> that is not conjugate to <math>x</math> and let <math>D = C_g(y)</math> || || <math>G</math> has at least two conjugacy classes of involutions || Step (1) || Given-direct | |||
|- | |||
| 3 || Let <math>y = y_1, y_2, \dots, y_t</math> be distinct involutions of <math>D</math>, and define <math>D_i = C_G(y_i)</math>. In particular, <math>D_1 = D</math>. || || || Step (2) || <toggledisplay>Note that <math>y</math> centralizes itself, so it is an element of <math>D</math>.</toggledisplay> | |||
|- | |||
| 4 || <math>t \le |D| \le h</math> || || definition of <math>h</math> || Step (1) || <toggledisplay><math>t \le |D|</math> because the <math>y_i</math> are all distinct elements of <math>D</math>. <math>|D| \le h</math> because <math>D</math> is a centralizer of involution and by definition, <math>h</math> is the maximum of the orders of such subgroups.</toggledisplay> | |||
|- | |||
| 5 || The number of distinct non-identity elements in <math>\bigcup_{i=1}^t D_i</math> is less than <math>h^2</math> || || || || <toggledisplay>Each <math>D_i</math> has at most <math>h - 1</math> non-identity elements, and there are <math>t</math> of them, with <math>t \le h</math>. So, the total number of elements is less than <math>h^2</math>.</toggledisplay> | |||
|- | |||
| 6 || Suppose <math>x</math> has a total of <math>m</math> conjugates <math>x_1, x_2, \dots, x_m</math>. Then, each <math>x_j</math> is contained in the union <math>\bigcup_{i=1}^t D_i</math> || Fact (1) || || || <toggledisplay>Any <math>x_j</math> is conjugate to <math>x</math>. Since by assumption <math>x</math> is not conjugate to <math>y</math>, <math>x_j</math> is not conjugate to <math>y</math>. Thus, by fact (1), there exists an involution centralizing both <math>x_j</math> and <math>y</math>. This involution lives in <math>C_G(y)</math> so it is some <math>y_i</math>. Thus, <math>x_j \in C_G(y_i)</math> for some <math>i</math>.</toggledisplay> | |||
|- | |||
| 7 || <math>m < h^2</math> || || || Steps (5), (6) || Step-combination direct. | |||
|- | |||
| 8 || <math>|G| < h^3</math> || Fact (2) || || || By Fact (2), we get <math>m = |G|/h</math>. Since <math>m < h^2</math> by the previous step, we get <math>|G| < h^3</math>. | |||
|} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 00:08, 13 September 2011
Statement
Suppose is a finite group such that there are at least two conjugacy classes of involutions (non-identity elements of order two) in . Then, if is the maximum of the orders of all subgroups of that arise as a Centralizer of involution (?), we have:
.
Related facts
- Dihedral trick
- Every finite group of even order has a proper subgroup of order greater than the cuberoot of the order
- Finite simple non-abelian group has order greater than product of order of proper subgroup and its centralizer
- Finite group having exactly one conjugacy class of involutions need not have order less than the cube of the order of the centralizer of involution
Facts used
- Involutions are either conjugate or have an involution centralizing both of them
- Group acts as automorphisms by conjugation
- Fundamental theorem of group actions
Proof
Given: A group with at least two conjugacy classes of involutions. is the maximum possible order of a subgroup arising as the centralizer of an involution of .
To prove: .
Proof:
| Step no. | Assertion/construction | Facts used | Given data used | Previous steps used | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Let be an involution of such that has order and let . | definition of | Note that exists by the definition of . | ||
| 2 | Let be an involution of that is not conjugate to and let | has at least two conjugacy classes of involutions | Step (1) | Given-direct | |
| 3 | Let be distinct involutions of , and define . In particular, . | Step (2) | [SHOW MORE] | ||
| 4 | definition of | Step (1) | [SHOW MORE] | ||
| 5 | The number of distinct non-identity elements in is less than | [SHOW MORE] | |||
| 6 | Suppose has a total of conjugates . Then, each is contained in the union | Fact (1) | [SHOW MORE] | ||
| 7 | Steps (5), (6) | Step-combination direct. | |||
| 8 | Fact (2) | By Fact (2), we get . Since by the previous step, we get . |
References
Textbook references
- Finite Groups by Daniel Gorenstein, ISBN 0821843427, Page 301, Chapter 9 (Groups of even order), Theorem 1.3, More info