CA-group: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
(Started the page)
 
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{group property}}
{{group property}}
 
{{disjunctive definition}}
{{centralizer-determined|[[Abelian group]]}}


==History==
==History==
Line 11: Line 10:
==Definition==
==Definition==


===Symbol-free definition===
Below are listed some '''equivalent definitions''' of CA-group, also called '''centralizer is abelian''' group:


A [[group]] is termed a '''CA-group''' or a '''Centralizer is Abelian''' group if it satisfies the following conditions:
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! No. !! Shorthand !! A group is termed a CN-group if ... !! A group <math>G</math> is termed a CN-group if ...
|-
| 1 || element centralizers are abelian || the [[defining ingredient::centralizer]] of any non-identity element is an [[defining ingredient::abelian group|abelian]] subgroup. || for every non-identity element <math>x \in G</math>, the [[centralizer]] <math>C_G(x)</math> (i.e., the set of all elements of <math>G</math> that commute with <math>x</math>) is an [[abelian group|abelian]] subgroup of <math>G</math>.
|-
| 2  || subgroup centralizers are abelian || the [[centralizer]] of any nontrivial subgroup is an [[abelian group|abelian]] subgroup. || for every nontrivial subgroup <math>H</math> of <math>G</math>, the centralizer <math>C_G(H)</math> is an [[abelian group|abelian]] subgroup of <math>G</math>.
|-
| 3 || subgroups: abelian or centerless || every [[subgroup]] of the group is either an [[abelian group]] or a [[defining ingredient::centerless group]]. || for every nontrivial subgroup <math>H</math> of <math>G</math>, either <math>H</math> is abelian or <math>H</math> is centerless, i.e., the [[defining ingredient::center]] of <math>H</math> is trivial.
|}


* The [[centralizer]] of any nontrivial element is an [[Abelian group|Abelian]] subgroup.
===Equivalence of definitions===
* The [[centralizer]] of any nontrivial subgroup is an [[Abelian group|Abelian]] subgroup.


===Definition with symbols===
{{further|[[equivalence of definitions of CA-group]]}}


A [[group]] <math>G</math> is termed a CA-group or a '''Centralizer is Abelian''' group if it satisfies the following conditions:
==Metaproperties==


* For any <math>e \ne x \in G</math>, the group <math>C_G(x)</math> is [[Abelian group|Abelian]]
{| class="sortable" border="1"
* For any nontrivial subgroup <math>H \le G</math>, the group <math>C_G(H)</math> is [[Abelian group|Abelian]]
! Metaproperty name !! Satisfied? !! Proof !! Statement with symbols
|-
| [[satisfies metaproperty::subgroup-closed group property]] || Yes || direct from version (3) of the definition || Suppose <math>G</math> is a CA-group and <math>H</math> is a subgroup of <math>G</math>. Then, <math>H</math> is also a CA-group.
|-
| [[satisfies metaproperty::direct product-closed group property]] || Yes || || Suppose <math>G_i, i \in I</math> are CA-groups. Then, the [[external direct product]] <math>\prod_{i \in I} G_i</math> is also a CA-group.
|}


==Relation with other properties==
==Relation with other properties==
Line 29: Line 40:
===Stronger properties===
===Stronger properties===


* [[Abelian group]]
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! Property !! Meaning !! Proof of implication !! Proof of strictness (reverse implication failure) !! Intermediate notions
|-
| [[Weaker than::abelian group]] || || (by definition) || [[CA not implies abelian]] || {{intermediate notions short|CA-group|abelian group}}
|}


===Weaker properties===
===Weaker properties===


* [[CN-group]]
{| class="sortable" border="1"
 
! Property !! Meaning !! Proof of implication !! Proof of strictness (reverse implication failure) !! Intermediate notions
==Metaproperties==
|-
 
| [[Stronger than::CN-group]] || || || || {{intermediate notions short|CN-group|CA-group}}
{{S-closed}}
|}
 
If <math>G</math> is a CA-group and <math>H \le G</math> is a subgroup, then for any <math>x \in H</math>, <math>C_H(x) = H \cap C_G(x)</math>. Hence, if <math>C_G(x)</math> is Abelian, so is <math>C_H(x)</math>. Thus, any subgroup of a CA-group is a CA-group.
 
{{DP-closed}}
 
If <math>G_1</math> and <math>G_2</math> are CA-groups, so is <math>G_1 \times G_2</math>, because the centralizer of the element <math>(x_1,x_2) \in G_1 \times G_2</math> is <math>C_{G_1}(x_1) \times C_{G_2}(x_2)</math>.

Latest revision as of 23:40, 7 July 2013

This article defines a group property: a property that can be evaluated to true/false for any given group, invariant under isomorphism
View a complete list of group properties
VIEW RELATED: Group property implications | Group property non-implications |Group metaproperty satisfactions | Group metaproperty dissatisfactions | Group property satisfactions | Group property dissatisfactions

DISJUNCTIVE DEFINITION: This article defines a term where the definition (or at least, one of the equivalent definitions) has the form "every A is a B or a C."

History

Origin

The concept and terminology of CA-groups was introduced by Michio Suzuki in his attempts to solve Burnside's conjecture (which later became the odd-order theorem).

Definition

Below are listed some equivalent definitions of CA-group, also called centralizer is abelian group:

No. Shorthand A group is termed a CN-group if ... A group is termed a CN-group if ...
1 element centralizers are abelian the centralizer of any non-identity element is an abelian subgroup. for every non-identity element , the centralizer (i.e., the set of all elements of that commute with ) is an abelian subgroup of .
2 subgroup centralizers are abelian the centralizer of any nontrivial subgroup is an abelian subgroup. for every nontrivial subgroup of , the centralizer is an abelian subgroup of .
3 subgroups: abelian or centerless every subgroup of the group is either an abelian group or a centerless group. for every nontrivial subgroup of , either is abelian or is centerless, i.e., the center of is trivial.

Equivalence of definitions

Further information: equivalence of definitions of CA-group

Metaproperties

Metaproperty name Satisfied? Proof Statement with symbols
subgroup-closed group property Yes direct from version (3) of the definition Suppose is a CA-group and is a subgroup of . Then, is also a CA-group.
direct product-closed group property Yes Suppose are CA-groups. Then, the external direct product is also a CA-group.

Relation with other properties

Stronger properties

Property Meaning Proof of implication Proof of strictness (reverse implication failure) Intermediate notions
abelian group (by definition) CA not implies abelian |FULL LIST, MORE INFO

Weaker properties

Property Meaning Proof of implication Proof of strictness (reverse implication failure) Intermediate notions
CN-group |FULL LIST, MORE INFO