Sufficiently large implies splitting: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
(Created page with '==Statement== Let <math>G</math> be a finite group, and let <math>d</math> be the exponent of <math>G</math>: in other words, <math>d</math> is the l...')
 
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


Then, <math>k</math> is a [[splitting field]] for <math>G</math>: Every linear representation of <math>G</math> that can be realized over an algebraic extension of <math>k</math> can in fact be realized over <math>k</math>.
Then, <math>k</math> is a [[splitting field]] for <math>G</math>: Every linear representation of <math>G</math> that can be realized over an algebraic extension of <math>k</math> can in fact be realized over <math>k</math>.
==Particular cases==
Note that if the exponent is <math>2s</math>where <math>s</math> is odd, the existence of <math>s^{th}</math> roots guarantees the existence of <math>(2s)^{th}</math> roots. Hence, the smallest <math>d</math> to guarantee sufficiently large in such circumstances is taken as <math>s</math>.
The [[symmetric group:S3|symmetric group of degree three]] is the first example where the <math>d</math>-values for sufficiently large and splitting diverge.
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! Group !! Order !! Smallest <math>d</math> such that existence of <math>d^{th}</math> roots guarantees sufficiently large !! Smallest <math>d</math> such that existence of <math>d^{th}</math> roots guarantees splitting
|-
| [[trivial group]] || 1 || 1 || 1
|-
| [[cyclic group:Z2]] || 2 || 1 || 1
|-
| [[cyclic group:Z3]] || 3 || 3 || 3
|-
| [[cyclic group:Z4]] || 4 || 4 || 4
|-
| [[Klein four-group]] || 4 || 1 || 1
|-
| [[cyclic group:Z5]] || 5 || 5 || 5
|-
| [[symmetric group:S3]] || 6 || 3 || 1
|-
| [[cyclic group:Z6]] || 6 || 3 || 3
|-
| [[dihedral group:D8]] || 8 || 4 || 1
|-
| [[quaternion group]] || 8 || 4 || 4
|-
| [[symmetric group:S4]] || 24 || 12 || 1
|}
==Related facts==
* [[Sufficiently large implies splitting for every subquotient]]
* [[Splitting not implies sufficiently large]]
* [[Splitting field for a group implies splitting field for every quotient]]
* [[Splitting field for a group not implies splitting field for every subgroup]]
===Facts about minimal splitting fields===
* [[Minimal splitting field need not be unique]]
* [[Minimal splitting field need not be cyclotomic]]
* [[Field generated by character values is splitting field implies it is the unique minimal splitting field]]
==Facts used==
# [[uses::Brauer's induction theorem]] (this is also called the characterization of linear characters lemma)
==Proof==
'''Given''': A finite group <math>G</math>, a field <math>k</math> that is sufficiently large for <math>G</math>.
'''To prove''': <math>k</math> is a splitting field for <math>G</math>.
'''Proof''': By fact (1), every character of <math>G</math> over <math>K</math> is a <math>\mathbb{Z}</math>-linear combination of characters induced from characters of elementary subgroups of <math>G</math>. Since elementary groups are supersolvable, every character of an elementary subgroup is induced from a linear character on some subgroup of it; hence, every character of <math>G</math> is a <math>\mathbb{Z}</math>-linear combination of linear characters on subgroups.
Now, every linear character can be realized over <math>k</math> because <math>k</math> is sufficiently large, and the induced representation from a linear character can be realized over the same field, so there is a collection of representations realized over <math>k</math> whose characters have all the irreducible characters in their <math>\mathbb{Z}</math>-span. This forces that all the irreducible representations over any extension of <math>k</math> can be realized over the field <math>k</math>.
==References==
===Textbook references===
* {{booklink-proved|Serre|94|Corollary to Theorem 24, Section 12.3}}

Latest revision as of 16:25, 4 July 2011

Statement

Let G be a finite group, and let d be the exponent of G: in other words, d is the least common multiple of the orders of all elements of G. Suppose k is a sufficiently large field for G: k is a field whose characteristic does not divide the order of G, and such that the polynomial xd1 splits completely over k.

Then, k is a splitting field for G: Every linear representation of G that can be realized over an algebraic extension of k can in fact be realized over k.

Particular cases

Note that if the exponent is 2swhere s is odd, the existence of sth roots guarantees the existence of (2s)th roots. Hence, the smallest d to guarantee sufficiently large in such circumstances is taken as s.

The symmetric group of degree three is the first example where the d-values for sufficiently large and splitting diverge.

Group Order Smallest d such that existence of dth roots guarantees sufficiently large Smallest d such that existence of dth roots guarantees splitting
trivial group 1 1 1
cyclic group:Z2 2 1 1
cyclic group:Z3 3 3 3
cyclic group:Z4 4 4 4
Klein four-group 4 1 1
cyclic group:Z5 5 5 5
symmetric group:S3 6 3 1
cyclic group:Z6 6 3 3
dihedral group:D8 8 4 1
quaternion group 8 4 4
symmetric group:S4 24 12 1

Related facts

Facts about minimal splitting fields

Facts used

  1. Brauer's induction theorem (this is also called the characterization of linear characters lemma)

Proof

Given: A finite group G, a field k that is sufficiently large for G.

To prove: k is a splitting field for G.

Proof: By fact (1), every character of G over K is a Z-linear combination of characters induced from characters of elementary subgroups of G. Since elementary groups are supersolvable, every character of an elementary subgroup is induced from a linear character on some subgroup of it; hence, every character of G is a Z-linear combination of linear characters on subgroups.

Now, every linear character can be realized over k because k is sufficiently large, and the induced representation from a linear character can be realized over the same field, so there is a collection of representations realized over k whose characters have all the irreducible characters in their Z-span. This forces that all the irreducible representations over any extension of k can be realized over the field k.

References

Textbook references

  • Linear representations of finite groups by Jean-Pierre Serre, 10-digit ISBN 0287901906 (English), ISBN 3540901906 (French), Page 94, Corollary to Theorem 24, Section 12.3, More info