Relation implication expression: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
m (10 revisions)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{formal expression for subgroup property}}
{{formal expression for subgroup property|Relation-implication-expressible subgroup properties}}


==Definition==
==Definition==
Line 8: Line 8:


<math>H \le G</math> satisfies <math>a \implies b</math> if for any subgroup <math>K</math> such that <math>(H,K)</math> satisfies <math>a</math>, <math>(H,K)</math> must also satisfy <math>b</math>.
<math>H \le G</math> satisfies <math>a \implies b</math> if for any subgroup <math>K</math> such that <math>(H,K)</math> satisfies <math>a</math>, <math>(H,K)</math> must also satisfy <math>b</math>.
An expression of a subgroup property in terms of a relation implication operator between subgroup relations, is termed a '''relation implication expression'''.


==Examples==
==Examples==
Note that technically, every subgroup property can be expressed via a relation implication. However, it is not true that every subgroup property benefits from being viewed using a relation implication expression. For a complete list of subgroup properties for which such an expression is useful, refer:
[[:Category:Relation-implication-expressible subgroup properties]]


===Equivalence relation implications===
===Equivalence relation implications===

Latest revision as of 00:07, 8 May 2008

This page describes a formal expression, or formalism, that can be used to describe certain subgroup properties.


View a complete list of formal expressions for subgroup properties OR View subgroup properties expressible using this formalism

Definition

A subgroup relation is a property that can be evaluated for an ordered pair of subgroups of a group. It can thus be thought of as a property over ordered pairs of subgroups in the same group.

The relation implication operator takes as input two subgroup relations and outputs a subgroup property, as follows. Given two subgroup relations and , the subgroup property is defined as follows:

satisfies if for any subgroup such that satisfies , must also satisfy .

An expression of a subgroup property in terms of a relation implication operator between subgroup relations, is termed a relation implication expression.

Examples

Note that technically, every subgroup property can be expressed via a relation implication. However, it is not true that every subgroup property benefits from being viewed using a relation implication expression. For a complete list of subgroup properties for which such an expression is useful, refer:

Category:Relation-implication-expressible subgroup properties

Equivalence relation implications

Some important equivalence relations are:

  • Having the same order
  • Being isomorphic as abstract groups
  • Being automorphs, that is, being subgroups such that one can be taken to the other via an automorphism of the whole group
  • Being conjugate subgroups, that is, being subgroups such that one can be taken to the other via an inner automorpism of the whole group
  • Being the same subgroup

These equivalence relations are in increasing order of fineness.

Some natural relation implication properties arising from these are:

Permutability

Here are some important subgroup relations:

  • Permuting subgroups: Two subgroups and are said to permute if or equivalently, if is a group.
  • Totally permuting subgroups: Two subgroups and are said to be totally permuting if every subgroup of permutes with every subgroup of .

Given a subgroup relation , a subgroup is said to be -permutable if it satisfies Permuting.

For instance: