Local powering-invariant subgroup containing the center is intermediately local powering-invariant in nilpotent group: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Statement==
==Statement==


Suppose <math>G</math> is a [[nilpotent group]] and <math>H</math> is a [[subgroup containing the center]] of <math>G</math> that is also a [[local powering-invariant subgroup]] of <math>G</math>. Then, <math>H</math> is an [[intermediately local powering-invariant subgroup]] of <math>G</math>. Explicitly, suppose <math>K</math> is a subgroup of <math>G</math> containing <math>H</math>. Then, <math>H</math> is a [[local powering-invariant subgroup]] of <math>K</math>.
Suppose <math>G</math> is a [[fact about::nilpotent group;3| ]][[uses property satisfaction of::nilpotent group]] and <math>H</math> is a [[subgroup containing the center]] of <math>G</math> that is also a [[fact about::local powering-invariant subgroup;2| ]][[uses property satisfaction of::local powering-invariant subgroup]] of <math>G</math>. Then, <math>H</math> is an [[fact about::intermediately local powering-invariant subgroup;3| ]][[proves property satisfaction of::intermediately local powering-invariant subgroup]] of <math>G</math>. Explicitly, suppose <math>K</math> is a subgroup of <math>G</math> containing <math>H</math>. Then, <math>H</math> is a [[local powering-invariant subgroup]] of <math>K</math>.


==Related facts==
==Related facts==
Line 11: Line 11:
# Torsion-freeness for a prime is subgroup-closed
# Torsion-freeness for a prime is subgroup-closed
# [[uses::Equivalence of definitions of nilpotent group that is torsion-free for a set of primes]]
# [[uses::Equivalence of definitions of nilpotent group that is torsion-free for a set of primes]]
# [[uses::Nilpotency is subgroup-closed]]


==Proof==
==Proof==
Line 23: Line 24:
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Facts used !! Given data used !! Previous steps used !! Explanation
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Facts used !! Given data used !! Previous steps used !! Explanation
|-
|-
| 1 || <math>Z(G) \le K</math>. || || <math>Z(G) \le H, H \le K</math>. || || given-direct
| 1 || <math>Z(G) \le K</math>. || || <math>Z(G) \le H, H \le K</math> || || given-direct
|-
|-
| 2 || <math>K</math> is <math>p</math>-torsion-free. || Fact (2) || <math>h \in K</math> has a unique <math>p^{th}</math> root in <math>K</math>. || || We use the equivalence (3) implies (1) within the multi-part equivalence of Fact (2).
| 2 || <math>K</math> is nilpotent. || Fact (3) || <math>G</math> is nilpotent, <math>K \le G</math> || || Given-fact direct
|-
|-
| 3 || <math>Z(G)</math> is <math>p</math>-torsion-free. || Fact (1) || || Steps (1), (2) || Step-fact combination direct
| 3 || <math>K</math> is <math>p</math>-torsion-free. || Fact (2) || <math>h \in K</math> has a unique <math>p^{th}</math> root in <math>K</math> || || We use the equivalence (3) implies (1) within the multi-part equivalence of Fact (2).
|-
|-
| 4 || The map <math>t \mapsto t^p</math> is injective in <math>G</math>. || Fact (2) ||<math>G</math> is nilpotent || Step (3) || Step-fact combination direct (specifically, we want to use the implication from (4) to (1) in the multi-part equivalence of Fact (2))
| 4 || <math>Z(G)</math> is <math>p</math>-torsion-free. || Fact (1) || || Steps (1), (3) || Step-fact combination direct
|-
|-
| 5 || The element <math>x \in K</math>is the unique <math>p^{th}</math> root of <math>h</math> in all of <math>G</math>. || || <math>x \in K</matH> satisfies <math>x^p = h</math>. || Step (4) || given-step direct
| 5 || The map <math>t \mapsto t^p</math> is injective in <math>G</math>. || Fact (2) ||<math>G</math> is nilpotent || Step (4) || Step-fact combination direct (specifically, we want to use the implication from (4) to (1) in the multi-part equivalence of Fact (2))
|-
|-
| 6 || The element <math>x</math> of Step (5) is in <math>H</math>. || || <math>H</math> is local powering-invariant in <math>G</math>. || Step (5) || Step-given combination direct.
| 6 || The element <math>x \in K</math>is the unique <math>p^{th}</math> root of <math>h</math> in all of <math>G</math>. || || <math>x \in K</matH> satisfies <math>x^p = h</math> || Step (5) || given-step direct
|-
| 7 || The element <math>x</math> of Step (6) is in <math>H</math>. || || <math>H</math> is local powering-invariant in <math>G</math> || Step (6) || Step-given combination direct.
|}
|}

Latest revision as of 01:43, 3 July 2026

Statement

Suppose G is a nilpotent group and H is a subgroup containing the center of G that is also a local powering-invariant subgroup of G. Then, H is an intermediately local powering-invariant subgroup of G. Explicitly, suppose K is a subgroup of G containing H. Then, H is a local powering-invariant subgroup of K.

Related facts

Facts used

  1. Torsion-freeness for a prime is subgroup-closed
  2. Equivalence of definitions of nilpotent group that is torsion-free for a set of primes
  3. Nilpotency is subgroup-closed

Proof

Given: A nilpotent group G, a subgroup H of G that is local powering-invariant and such that Z(G)H where Z(G) is the center of G. A subgroup K of G containing H. A prime number p and an element hH such that there is a unique element xK satisfying xp=h.

To prove: There exists a unique element xH such that xp=h.

Proof:

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 Z(G)K. Z(G)H,HK given-direct
2 K is nilpotent. Fact (3) G is nilpotent, KG Given-fact direct
3 K is p-torsion-free. Fact (2) hK has a unique pth root in K We use the equivalence (3) implies (1) within the multi-part equivalence of Fact (2).
4 Z(G) is p-torsion-free. Fact (1) Steps (1), (3) Step-fact combination direct
5 The map ttp is injective in G. Fact (2) G is nilpotent Step (4) Step-fact combination direct (specifically, we want to use the implication from (4) to (1) in the multi-part equivalence of Fact (2))
6 The element xKis the unique pth root of h in all of G. xK satisfies xp=h Step (5) given-step direct
7 The element x of Step (6) is in H. H is local powering-invariant in G Step (6) Step-given combination direct.