Automorph-conjugacy is transitive: Difference between revisions
m (2 revisions) |
(→Proof) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subgroup metaproperty satisfaction}} | {{subgroup metaproperty satisfaction| | ||
property = automorph-conjugate subgroup| | |||
metaproperty = transitive subgroup property}} | |||
==Statement== | ==Statement== | ||
Suppose <math>H \le K \le G</math> are groups such that <math>H</math> is an automorph-conjugate subgroup of <math>K</math>, and <math>K</math> is an automorph-conjugate subgroup of <math>G</math>. Then, <math>H</math> is an automorph-conjugate subgroup of <math>G</math>. | |||
==Proof== | |||
{{tabular proof format}} | |||
'''Given''': Groups <math>H \le K \le G</math> such that <math>H</math> is an automorph-conjugate subgroup of <math>K</math> and <math>K</math> is an automorph-conjugate subgroup of <math>G</math>. An automorphism <math>\sigma</math> of <math>G</math>. | |||
= | '''To prove''': There exists <math>x \in G</math> such that <math>\sigma(H) = xHx^{-1}</math> | ||
'''Proof''': | |||
{| class="sortable" border="1" | |||
! Step no. || Assertion/construction !! Given data used !! Previous steps used !! Explanation | |||
|- | |||
| 1 || <math>\sigma(H) \le \sigma(K)</math> || <math>H \le K</math> || || given-direct | |||
|- | |||
| 2 || There exists <math>g \in G</math> such that <math>g K g^{-1} = \sigma(K)</math> ||<math>K</math> is an automorph-conjugate subgroup of <math>G</math><br><math>\sigma</math> is an automorphism of <math>G</math> || || given-direct | |||
|- | |||
| 3 || Denote by <math>c_g</math> the map <math>u \mapsto gug^{-1}</math>. Then <math>c_g^{-1} \circ \sigma</math> is an automorphism of <math>G</math> that restricts to an automorphism of <math>K</math>. || || Step (2) || direct from the step | |||
|- | |||
| 4 || There exists <math>k \in K</math> such that <math>(c_g^{-1} \circ \sigma)(H) = kHk^{-1}</math>. || <math>H</math> is an automorph-conjugate subgroup of <math>K</math> || Step (3) || Step-given combination direct | |||
|- | |||
| 5 || Setting <math>x = gk</math>, we get that <math>\sigma(H) = xHx^{-1}</math> || || Step (4) || Simple algebraic manipulation gives <math>\sigma(H) = c_g(kHk^{-1})</math><br><math>= gkHk^{-1}g^{-1} = (gk)H(gk)^{-1}</math> | |||
|} | |||
Latest revision as of 03:08, 12 January 2026
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a subgroup property (i.e., automorph-conjugate subgroup) satisfying a subgroup metaproperty (i.e., transitive subgroup property)
View all subgroup metaproperty satisfactions | View all subgroup metaproperty dissatisfactions |Get help on looking up metaproperty (dis)satisfactions for subgroup properties
Get more facts about automorph-conjugate subgroup |Get facts that use property satisfaction of automorph-conjugate subgroup | Get facts that use property satisfaction of automorph-conjugate subgroup|Get more facts about transitive subgroup property
Statement
Suppose are groups such that is an automorph-conjugate subgroup of , and is an automorph-conjugate subgroup of . Then, is an automorph-conjugate subgroup of .
Proof
This proof uses a tabular format for presentation. Provide feedback on tabular proof formats in a survey (opens in new window/tab) | Learn more about tabular proof formats|View all pages on facts with proofs in tabular format
Given: Groups such that is an automorph-conjugate subgroup of and is an automorph-conjugate subgroup of . An automorphism of .
To prove: There exists such that
Proof:
| Step no. | Assertion/construction | Given data used | Previous steps used | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | given-direct | |||
| 2 | There exists such that | is an automorph-conjugate subgroup of is an automorphism of |
given-direct | |
| 3 | Denote by the map . Then is an automorphism of that restricts to an automorphism of . | Step (2) | direct from the step | |
| 4 | There exists such that . | is an automorph-conjugate subgroup of | Step (3) | Step-given combination direct |
| 5 | Setting , we get that | Step (4) | Simple algebraic manipulation gives |