Sufficiently large implies splitting for every subquotient: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
(Created page with '==Statement== ===Verbal statement== A fact about::sufficiently large field for a finite group is a fact about::splitting field for every fact about::subquotient of ...')
 
 
Line 9: Line 9:


==Related facts==
==Related facts==
===Converse===
The converse of the statement is true. In fact, if a field is a splitting field for every subgroup of a finite group, then it is sufficiently large. {{proofat|[[Splitting field for every subgroup implies sufficiently large]]}}
===Other related facts===


* [[Splitting not implies sufficiently large]]
* [[Splitting not implies sufficiently large]]

Latest revision as of 16:08, 26 June 2009

Statement

=Verbal statement

A Sufficiently large field (?) for a finite group is a Splitting field (?) for every Subquotient (?) of the group. In particular, it is a splitting field for every subgroup as well as for every quotient group.

Statement with symbols

Suppose is a finite group and is a sufficiently large field for . Then, if and is a normal subgroup of , then is a splitting field for the quotient group .

Related facts

Converse

The converse of the statement is true. In fact, if a field is a splitting field for every subgroup of a finite group, then it is sufficiently large. For full proof, refer: Splitting field for every subgroup implies sufficiently large

Other related facts

Facts used

  1. Sufficiently large implies splitting
  2. Exponent of subgroup divides exponent of group
  3. Exponent of quotient group divides exponent of group

Proof

Given: A group , a sufficiently large field for . Subgroups with normal in .

To prove: is a splitting field for .

Proof: By facts (2) and (3), the exponent of divides the exponent of . By the definition of sufficiently large, the polynomial splits completely into distinct linear factors over , where is the exponent of . Let be the exponent of . Then the polynomial , being a factor of , also splits completely into linear factors over . (A simpler way of saying this is that a field containing primitive roots of unity also contains primitive roots of unity for ).

Thus, is sufficiently large for . Hence, by fact (1), is a splitting field for .