Statement
Constructive statement
Suppose
is a subgroup of a group
, and
is a left transversal of
in
with the property that the representative of the coset
itself is the identity element. Suppose
is a generating set for
. Then, define
as the set of all elements in
that can be written as
where
and
are in
and
is in
.
Then,
is a generating set for
.
Factual statement
Any subgroup of finite index in a finitely generated group (see also: subgroup of finite index in finitely generated group) is finitely generated. This follows because when
and
are both finite sets, so is
.
Related facts
Applications
- Local finiteness is extension-closed: A locally finite group is a group in which every finitely generated subgroup is finite. If
is a group with a locally finite normal subgroup
such that
is also locally finite, then
is locally finite. The proof of this uses Schreier's lemma.
- Freeness is subgroup-closed: Any subgroup of a free group is free, and moreover, if the subgroup has finite index, the number of generators of the subgroup is given as a function of the number of generators of the whole group, and the index of the subgroup. The proof of this is based on a closer analysis of the constructive statement of Schreier's lemma.
Analogues in other algebraic structures
- Artin-Tate lemma: This states that if
are algebras over a commalg:Noetherian ring
, with
finitely generated as a
-algebra and
finitely generated as an
-module, then
is finitely generated as a
-algebra. Here, being finitely generated as a
-algebra plays the analogous role to being a finitely generated group, and
being finitely generated as an
-module plays the analogous role to a subgroup of finite index.
Related ideas
Proof
Proof idea
The key idea is to rewrite words originally in terms of
in terms of
, with a possible leading term from
. If the word happens to be in the subgroup, the leading term from
must be trivial, and thus, the word originally written in terms of
is expressible in terms of
.
Proof details in the form of a proof by induction
Given: A group
with a subgroup
having a left transversal
.
is a generating set for
.
is defined as the set of all elements of
expressible as
where
and
.
To prove:
.
Proof: Let
be the set of all elements of
and their inverses. Let
be the set of all elements of
and their inverses. We will prove that for any
:
,
where
denote the elements of
expressible as products of length at most
from elements of
,
respectively.
We prove this claim by induction on
. Let's first do the case
. We need to show that any element of
is in
. We make two cases:
- The element is an element
: [SHOW MORE]In this case, let

be the coset representative of

. Then

, where

is the identity element. Since the identity element is the coset representative of

,

so

by definition, so

.
- The element is
, with
: [SHOW MORE]In this case, let

be the coset representative of

. Then,

. We can write

. By assumption,

, so

is its coset representative, so

, so

, again showing that

.
We now give the induction step.
Suppose
. Then we can either write
or write
for
. We examine both cases.
: [SHOW MORE]By the induction step, write

, with

. Then

. Let

be the coset representative of

. Then,

. By assumption,

, so

.
: [SHOW MORE]By the induction step, write

, with

. Then

. Suppose

is the coset representative of

. Then,

. The middle term

is the inverse of

, which is by definition in

. Hence,

. Thus,

.
Thus, we have established that:
.
Now, any element of
is in particular an element of
, and since
generates
, every element of
is in
. Thus, for any element
, we have:
.
But since
, we have
, so
. In particular, this yields
. But the coset representative in
is by assumption trivial, so we get
. Thus,
. Since
was arbitrary, this shows that every element of
is in the subgroup generated by
.
Proof details in the form of writing down expressions
PLACEHOLDER FOR INFORMATION TO BE FILLED IN: [SHOW MORE]
One of the people editing this page intended to fill in this information at a later stage, but hasn't gotten around to doing it yet. If you see this placeholder for a long time, file an error report at the
error reporting page.
As an algorithm
Schreier's lemma can give an algorithm to compute a generating set for a subgroup starting from a generating set of the whole group and a system of coset representatives for the subgroup. The idea is to traverse all tuples of the form
where
and
.
The problem of determining a system of coset representatives is solved by means of a bradth-first search in the Cayley graph of the action of
on
in terms of the specified generating set of
.
Further information: Finding a generating set from a membership test