N-local nilpotency class n implies nilpotency class n

From Groupprops

Statement

For Lie rings

Suppose is a Lie ring and is a natural number such that and the -local nilpotency class of is at most . Then, is a nilpotent Lie ring and the nilpotency class of is at most .

Note that in the case that , need not be a Lie ring of nilpotency class two. However, we still must have that is a Lie ring of nilpotency class three.

For groups

Suppose is a group and is a natural number such that and the -local nilpotency class of is at most . Then, is a nilpotent group and the nilpotency class of is at most .

Note that in the case that , need not be a group of nilpotency class two. However, we still must have that is a group of nilpotency class three.

Related facts

Facts used

  1. Nilpotency class three is 3-local for Lie rings, nilpotency class three is 3-local for groups
  2. Relation between local nilpotency class of Lie ring and inner derivation ring, relation between local nilpotency class of group and inner automorphism group,

Proof

Proof for Lie rings

Given: A Lie ring , , the -local nilpotency class of is at most .

To prove: The nilpotency class of is at most .

Proof: We use Fact (2) to show that, if we take the quotient of by the member of its Lie ring, i.e., we consider the quotient , this is a Lie ring whose 3-local nilpotency class is at most 3. Now, we use Fact (1) to show that has class at most three. Hence, has class at most .

Proof for groups

Given: A group , , the -local nilpotency class of is at most .

To prove: The nilpotency class of is at most .

Proof: We use Fact (2) to show that, if we take the quotient of by the member of its upper central series, i.e., we consider the quotient , this is a group whose 3-local nilpotency class is at most 3. Now, we use Fact (1) to show that has class at most three. Hence, has class at most .