Equivalence of definitions of finite characteristically simple group

From Groupprops
Jump to: navigation, search
This article describes a fact or result that is not basic but it still well-established and standard. The fact may involve terms that are themselves non-basic
View other semi-basic facts in group theory
VIEW FACTS USING THIS: directly | directly or indirectly, upto two steps | directly or indirectly, upto three steps|
VIEW: Survey articles about this
This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term finite characteristically simple group
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions

The definitions that we have to prove as equivalent

We need to show that the following are equivalent for a nontrivial finite group:

  1. It is a characteristically simple group, i.e., it has no proper nontrivial characteristic subgroup.
  2. It can be expressed as an internal direct product of pairwise isomorphic finite simple groups.

Definitions used

Term Definition used
characteristic subgroup A subgroup of a group is termed characteristic if every automorphism of the whole group restricts to an automorphism of the subgroup.
simple group A nontrivial group is said to be simple if it has no proper nontrivial normal subgroup.
internal direct product (case of finitely many subgroups) We'll use the following definition of internal direct product, which is a little different from the usual one, but equivalent: G is an internal direct product of normal subgroups H_1,H_2,\dots,H_n if G = \prod_{j=1}^n H_j and, for all i with 1 \le i < n, H_{i+1} \cap \prod_{j=1}^i H_j is trivial.

Facts used

  1. Normality is strongly intersection-closed
  2. Normality is strongly join-closed
  3. Direct factor implies transitively normal
  4. Normality satisfies image condition
  5. Normal subdirect product of perfect groups equals direct product

Proof

Proof of (1) implies (2)

Given: A finite nontrivial group G that has no proper nontrivial characteristic subgroups.

To prove: We can find pairwise isomorphic finite simple subgroups H_1,H_2,\dots,H_n in G such that G is an internal direct product of H_1,H_2,\dots,H_n. The proof will also show, as a by-product, that every minimal normal subgroup is a direct factor.

Proof:

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 Let H be a minimal normal subgroup of G (note that G always has a minimal normal subgroup). G is finite and nontrivial. Since G is nontrivial, the set of nontrivial normal subgroups of G is non-empty (in particular, it includes G). Since G is finite, this set must have a minimal element (not necessarily unique). Let H be one such minimal normal subgroup.
2 G is the characteristic closure of H in G, i.e., G is generated by the set of all subgroups of the form \sigma(H), \sigma \in \operatorname{Aut}(G). G is characteristically simple. The group \langle \sigma(H) \rangle_{\sigma \in \operatorname{Aut}(G)}, i.e., the characteristic closure of H in G, is characteristic in G by definition. It's nontrivial, because it contains the nontrivial normal subgroup H. Combining with the fact that G is characteristically simple gives that this must be all of G.
3 Construct H_1,H_2, \dots, subgroups of G, all normal subgroups automorphic to H that together generate G, as follows. Set H_1 = H. Having constructed H_1,H_2,\dots,H_i, check if they generate G. If not, then set H_{i+1} to be any subgroup of the form \sigma(H) (for some automorphism \sigma of G) that is not contained in the subgroup \langle H_1,H_2,\dots,H_i\rangle. The process terminates in finitely many steps, because the subgroup generated keeps growing strictly at each stage, and G is a finite group. Let n be the total number of subgroups used. G is finite Steps (1), (2) Step (2) guarantees that if the subgroups so far do not generate G, then at least some subgroup automorphic to H has been missed from the collection, thus making this process valid.
4 For any automorphism \sigma of G and any normal subgroup K of G, either \sigma(H) \le K or \sigma(H) \cap K is trivial. Step (1) Since H is minimal normal, so is \sigma(H). Thus, by Fact (1), \sigma(H) \cap K is normal. Since \sigma(H) is minimal normal, either \sigma(H) \cap K is trivial or \sigma(H) \cap K = \sigma(H) (which means \sigma(H) \le K).
5 Each join \langle H_1,H_2,\dots,H_i \rangle = H_1H_2\dots H_i intersects H_{i+1} trivially for 1 \le i < n. Fact (2) Steps (3), (4) All the H_is are images of H under automorphisms, hence are normal. Thus, by Fact (2), their join is also normal (and equals their product). Further, by Step (4), this normal subgroup must either intersect H_{i+1} or contain H_{i+1}. However, it cannot contain H_{i+1} because of the way we construct H_{i+1}.
6 G is an internal direct product of H_1,H_2,\dots,H_n, which are all normal subgroups isomorphic to H and hence to each other (in fact, automorphic to each other in G). Steps (3), (5) Steps (3) and (5) show that all the conditions for an internal direct product are satisfied.
7 H is a direct factor of G. Steps (3), (6) Recall that we had set H_1 = H in Step (3), and then discovered that it is part of an internal direct product, hence it is a direct factor.
8 H is simple. Fact (3) Step (1) Since H is a direct factor of G, Fact (3) tells us that any normal subgroup of H is normal in G. Sine H is minimal normal, it cannot contain any strictly smaller nontrivial normal subgroups of G, and hence, by the preceding sentence, it cannot contain any proper nontrivial normal subgroups of itself. Thus, H is simple.

Steps (6) and (8) together are what we wanted to prove.

Proof of (2) implies (1)

Note that this implication actually works even for infinite groups, but we will restrict our proof to finite internal direct products.


Given: A nontrivial group G that is an internal direct product of pairwise isomorphic simple groups H_1,H_2,\dots,H_n.

To prove: G is characteristically simple.

Proof: We split in two cases. The simple groupsH_i are either all abelian (in which case G is also abelian) or all non-abelian (in which case G is also non-abelian).

Abelian case

In this case, all the H_is are isomorphic to a group of prime order for some prime number p, and G is an elementary abelian group of order p^n. This group is clearly characteristically simple, because it is a group whose automorphism group is transitive on non-identity elements (on account of being the additive group of a vector space).

Non-abelian case

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 Each of the H_is is a perfect group. Fact (4) The H_is are simple and non-abelian. given+fact-direct.
2 For any normal subgroup N of G, N is a subdirect product of some subset of the set of subgroups H_1,H_2,\dots,H_n. Fact (4) Consider the set of js such that the projection from N to H_j has a non-identity image. Each image is normal in H_j by fact (1). Since each H_j is simple, each such image must be equal to H_j. Thus, N is a subdirect product of those H_js.
3 For any normal subgroup N of G, N is the full subgroup generated by the H_js that figure in the subdirect product obtained in Step (2), i.e., it is the internal direct product of some subset of H_1,H_2,\dots,H_n. Fact (5) Steps (1), (2) Step-fact combination direct.
4 The only characteristic subgroups of G are G and the trivial subgroup. Step (3) Fix a system of isomorphisms that identify all the direct factors H_1,H_2,\dots,H_n. The symmetric group of degree n embeds inside \operatorname{Aut}(G) via its natural action by permutation of the direct factors since they are pairwise isomorphic. The only subsets of \{ 1,2, \dots, n \} that are invariant under this action are the whole set and the empty subset. Thus, the only normal subgroups of G that are invariant under all automorphisms induced by these permutations are the trivial subgroup and the whole group. Thus, G is characteristically simple.