Sylow implies order-dominating
From Groupprops
This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two subgroup properties, when the big group is a finite group. That is, it states that in a Finite group (?), every subgroup satisfying the first subgroup property (i.e., Sylow subgroup (?)) must also satisfy the second subgroup property (i.e., Order-dominating subgroup (?)). In other words, every Sylow subgroup of finite group is a order-dominating subgroup of finite group.
View all subgroup property implications in finite groupsView all subgroup property non-implications in finite groups
View all subgroup property implications
View all subgroup property non-implications
Contents
Statement
Property-theoretic statement
The subgroup property of being a Sylow subgroup is stronger than, or implies, the subgroup property of being an order-dominating subgroup: for any subgroup whose order divides the order of the Sylow subgroup, some conjugate of that subgroup is contained in the given Sylow subgroup.
Statement with symbols
Suppose is a finite group and
is a prime number. Then, if
is a
-Sylow subgroup and
is a
-subgroup of
, there exists
such that
.
This statement is a part of Sylow's theorem.
Related facts
Corollaries
- Sylow implies order-conjugate: This follows from the fact that order-dominating implies order-conjugate in co-Hopfian: in particular, in a finite group, any order-dominating subgroup is order-conjugate. In other words, any two
-Sylow subgroups are conjugate.
Proof
Proof using coset spaces
Given: a finite group,
a
-Sylow subgroup, and
a
-group. Suppose
where
is the order of
and
is relatively prime to
(So,
.
To prove: There exists such that
.
Proof: We prove this through a series of observations:
-
naturally acts (on the left) on the left coset space of
.
- Since
is a subgroup of
,
also acts on the left coset space of
- The left coset space of
has cardinality
, which is relatively prime to
. Hence, under the action of
(which is a
-group) on this set, there is at least one fixed point. Let the fixed point be
.
- We have
. This gives us:
, and hence
. Thus, a conjugate of
is contained inside
.