# Right congruence

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about a standard (though not very rudimentary) definition in group theory. The article text may, however, contain more than just the basic definition
VIEW: Definitions built on this | Facts about this: (facts closely related to Right congruence, all facts related to Right congruence) |Survey articles about this | Survey articles about definitions built on this
VIEW RELATED: Analogues of this | Variations of this | Opposites of this |
View a complete list of semi-basic definitions on this wiki

The notion of right congruence also makes sense in the more general context of a monoid. In fact, the same definition works.

## Definition

### Symbol-free definition

A right congruence on a group is an equivalence relation on the group with the property that the equivalence relation is preserved on right multiplication by any element of the group.

### Definition with symbols

A right congruence on a group $G$ is an equivalence relation $\equiv$ on $G$ such that:

$a \equiv b \implies ac \equiv bc$

## Relation with other notions

The dual notion to right congruence is the notion of left congruence.

An equivalence relation is termed a congruence if it is both a left congruence and a right congruence.

## Correspondence between subgroups and right congruences

The following is true:

Right congruences are precisely the equivalence relations whose equivalence classes are the right cosets of a subgroup

### Proving that any right congruence gives right cosets

We first show that the equivalence class of the identity element is a subgroup. For this, we show the following three things:

• Identity elements:The identity element is equivalent to the identity element: This follows on account of the relation being reflexive
• Closure under multiplication: If $a,b \equiv e$, so is $ab$: The proof of this comes as follows. Suppose $a \equiv e$. Then $ab \equiv b$. We already know that $b \equiv e$. Hence, by the transitivity of $\equiv$, we have $ab \equiv e$.
• Closure under inverses: If $a \equiv e$, then we can right multiply both sides by $a^{-1}$ and obtain $e \equiv a^{-1}$

Let $H$ denote this subgroup. Then clearly, for any $x \in G$, $x \equiv hx$ (right multiplying $e \equiv h$ by $x$). Thus all the elements in the right coset of $H$ are in the same equivalence class as $x$.

Further, we can show that if $x \equiv y$, they must be in the same right coset. Suppose $x \equiv y$. Then, right multiply both sides by $y^{-1}$. This gives $xy^{-1} \equiv e$, hence $xy^{-1} \in H$ or $y \in Hx$.

### Proving that right cosets give a right congruence

This is more or less direct. PLACEHOLDER FOR INFORMATION TO BE FILLED IN: [SHOW MORE]