# Difference between revisions of "Derivation-invariance is transitive"

From Groupprops

(→Proof) |
|||

Line 17: | Line 17: | ||

==Proof== | ==Proof== | ||

− | '''Given''': A Lie ring <math>L</math> with Lie subrings <math>A \le B \le L</math>. <math>B</math> is a derivation-invariant Lie subring of <math>L</math>. | + | '''Given''': A Lie ring <math>L</math> with Lie subrings <math>A \le B \le L</math>. <math>B</math> is a derivation-invariant Lie subring of <math>L</math> and <math>A</math> is a derivation-invariant subring of <math>B</matH>. |

'''To prove''': <math>A</math> is a derivation-invariant subring of <math>L</math>. | '''To prove''': <math>A</math> is a derivation-invariant subring of <math>L</math>. |

## Revision as of 21:51, 27 June 2012

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a Lie subring property (i.e., derivation-invariant Lie subring) satisfying a Lie subring metaproperty (i.e., transitive Lie subring property)

View all Lie subring metaproperty satisfactions | View all Lie subring metaproperty dissatisfactions |Get help on looking up metaproperty (dis)satisfactions for Lie subring properties

Get more facts about derivation-invariant Lie subring |Get facts that use property satisfaction of derivation-invariant Lie subring | Get facts that use property satisfaction of derivation-invariant Lie subring|Get more facts about transitive Lie subring property

ANALOGY: This is an analogue in Lie rings of a fact encountered in group. The old fact is: characteristicity is transitive.

Another analogue to the same fact, in the same new context, is: characteristicity is transitive for Lie rings

View other analogues of characteristicity is transitive|View other analogues from group to Lie ring (OR, View as a tabulated list)

## Statement

A derivation-invariant Lie subring of a derivation-invariant Lie subring is a derivation-invariant Lie subring.

## Related facts

## Proof

**Given**: A Lie ring with Lie subrings . is a derivation-invariant Lie subring of and is a derivation-invariant subring of .

**To prove**: is a derivation-invariant subring of .

**Proof**: Suppose is a derivation of .

Since is a derivation-invariant subring of , restricts to a map from to itself. Let be the restriction of to . Clearly, is a *derivation* of .

Since is derivation-invariant in , restricts to a map from to itself. Thus, restricts to a map from to .