# Automorph-conjugacy is not finite-intersection-closed

From Groupprops

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a subgroup property (i.e., automorph-conjugate subgroup)notsatisfying a subgroup metaproperty (i.e., finite-intersection-closed subgroup property).

View all subgroup metaproperty dissatisfactions | View all subgroup metaproperty satisfactions|Get help on looking up metaproperty (dis)satisfactions for subgroup properties

Get more facts about automorph-conjugate subgroup|Get more facts about finite-intersection-closed subgroup property|

## Statement

We can have a group with two automorph-conjugate subgroups , such that is not automorph-conjugate in .

## Proof

### Example in the symmetric group

`Further information: symmetric group:S6`

(This example demonstrates the stronger fact that automorph-conjugacy is not conjugate-intersection-closed).

Let be the symmetric group on six letters: . Let be the following 2-Sylow subgroups of :

In other words, is the internal direct product of a 2-Sylow subgroup on with the 2-Sylow subgroup on , while is the internal direct product of the 2-Sylow subgroup on with a 2-Sylow subgroup on .

The intersection is given by:

.

Now, note that:

- Both and are automorph-conjugate, because they are both Sylow subgroups, and Sylow implies automorph-conjugate.
- is not automorph-conjugate. To see this, note that has an outer automorphism that sends transpositions to triple transpositions. Under this automorphism, goes to a subgroup of that contains three commuting triple transpositions. If this is conjugate to , then should also contain three commuting triple transpositions. But it doesn't.