Hall not implies order-isomorphic

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of a non-implication relation between two subgroup properties. That is, it states that every subgroup satisfying the first subgroup property need not satisfy the second subgroup property
View a complete list of subgroup property non-implications | View a complete list of subgroup property implications
|

Property "Page" (as page type) with input value "{{{stronger}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.Property "Page" (as page type) with input value "{{{weaker}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.

EXPLORE EXAMPLES YOURSELF: View examples of subgroups satisfying property {{{stronger}}} but not {{{weaker}}}|View examples of subgroups satisfying property {{{stronger}}} and {{{weaker}}}

Statement

Two Hall subgroups of the same order in a group, need not be isomorphic.

Proof

An example is the group $SL(2,11)$. This group has order $2^2.3.11$, and the $11^{\prime }$-Hall subgroups have order 12. It turns out that there are two possible isomorphism classes of such subgroups: the dihedral group on twelve elements, and the alternating group on four elements.

Here are explicit embeddings of these subgroups:

PLACEHOLDER FOR INFORMATION TO BE FILLED IN: [SHOW MORE]

One of the people editing this page intended to fill in this information at a later stage, but hasn't gotten around to doing it yet. If you see this placeholder for a long time, file an error report at the error reporting page.