Commuting fraction more than five-eighths implies abelian

From Groupprops
Revision as of 04:46, 5 January 2018 by Vipul (talk | contribs) (→‎History)

This article is about a result whose hypothesis or conclusion has to do with the fraction of group elements or tuples of group elements satisfying a particular condition.The fraction involved in this case is 5/8
View other such statements

History

It is likely that this statement, being quite simple, was known to many people since the beginnings of group theory and/or rediscovered a number of times. The first written proof appears in a paper by Erdos and Turan.

Statement

For a finite group in terms of commuting fractions

Suppose is a finite group such that the commuting fraction of is more than . Then, is an abelian group, and in particular, a finite abelian group.

In particular, if we define:

Then:

abelian

Note that since the commuting fraction of a finite abelian group is , this means that the commuting fraction of a finite group cannot take any value strictly between and .

For a finite group in terms of conjugacy classes

Suppose is a finite group and is the number of conjugacy classes in . Then:

abelian.

For a FZ-group

Suppose is a FZ-group whose commuting fraction is more than . Then, is an abelian group.

Related facts

Applications

The fact has applications to the abelianness testing problem, and is the basis for the randomized black-box group algorithm for abelianness testing.

Similar facts

Facts used

  1. Cyclic over central implies abelian
  2. Lagrange's theorem in the special form subgroup of size more than half is whole group

Proof

Proof for a finite non-abelian group

Given: A finite non-abelian group .

To prove: The commuting fraction of is at most .

Proof: Let be the center of .

Step no. Assertion Given data used Facts used Previous steps used Explanation
1 is not cyclic is non-abelian Fact (1) -- By fact (1), if were cyclic, would be abelian, a contradiction.
2 is at least -- Step (1) Any group of order 1, 2, or 3 is cyclic, forcing to have size at least .
3 For all elements in and not in , the quotient is at most Fact (2) -- If is not in , then is a proper subgroup of . By fact (2), we get that .
4 The commuting fraction of is -- -- By definition. Explicitly, the commuting fraction is . Those that are in can be separated out and we get the summation in the form presented.
5 The commuting fraction of is at most -- Steps (3) and (4) By Step (3), for each . The sum is thus bounded by the size of times this individual bound.
6 The commuting fraction of is at most -- Step (5) Algebraic simplification
7 The commuting fraction of is at most Fact (2) Steps (2), (6) By Fact (2), which by Step (2) is at most 1/4. Plugging this into Step (6), we get that the commuting fraction of is at most .