Every group is isoclinic to a stem group
Statement
Suppose is a group. Then, there exists a group such that:
- is a stem group, i.e., .
- and are isoclinic groups.
Related facts
- Stem group has the minimum order among all groups isoclinic to it
- Formula for second cohomology group in terms of Schur multiplier and abelianization
Proof
Given: A group .
To prove: There exists a group such that is isoclinic to , and .
Proof: Let be the center of , and let . First, consider the short exact sequence:
Consider the short exact sequence that gives the formula for second cohomology group in terms of Schur multiplier and abelianization.
Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle 0 \to operatorname{Ext}^1((G/Z)^{\operatorname{ab};Z) \to H^2(G/Z;Z) \to \operatorname{Hom}(H_2(G/Z;\mathbb{Z}),Z) \to 0}
The group can be viewed as giving rise to an element of , which, under the mapping, gives an element of . It turns out from the constriction (see the formula page) that the image of the mapping must necessarily lie in the subgroup . In fact, the image of the homomorphism is precisely . Thus, in fact, we get an element of .
Now, consider the short exact sequence for the formula for second cohomology group in terms of Schur multiplier and abelianization with used in place of as the central subgroup:
Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle 0 \to operatorname{Ext}^1((G/Z)^{\operatorname{ab};Z \cap G') \to H^2(G/Z;Z \cap G') \to \operatorname{Hom}(H_2(G/Z;\mathbb{Z}),Z \cap G') \to 0}
Because we know the right map is surjective, we can find an element of that maps to the element obtained above in . Denote the corresponding extension group by . We claim that:
- is isoclinic to : In fact, the central subgroup for the extension used to construct is precisely the center of .
- : We know that the image of the mapping in is surjective to the central subgroup, and also that the image is contained in the derived subgroup, so .
References
Journal references
- The classification of prime-power groups by Philip Hall, Volume 69, (Year 1937): Official linkMore info: The assertion is made without an explicit proof, but the reasoning for the proof is given in preceding paragraphs, with the backdrop assumption of finiteness.