Zero-or-scalar lemma

From Groupprops
Revision as of 22:26, 22 February 2011 by Vipul (talk | contribs)

Statement

Let be a finite group and a nontrivial Irreducible linear representation (?) of over . Let , such that the size of the conjugacy class of is relatively prime to the degree of . Then, either is a scalar or .

Facts used

  1. Size-degree-weighted characters are algebraic integers
  2. Characters are algebraic integers
  3. Element of finite order is semisimple and eigenvalues are roots of unity

Proof

Given: A finite group , a nontrivial irreducible linear representation of over with character . An element with conjugacy class . The degree of and the size of are relatively prime.

To prove: Either or is a scalar.

Proof:

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 The number is an algebraic integer. Fact (1) is finite, is an irreducible representation of over with character Given+Fact direct
2 There exist integers and such that and (the degree of ) are relatively prime. By definition of relatively prime.
3 We get Step (2) Multiply both sides of Step (2) by .
4 The expression gives an algebraic integer. Fact (2) Step (1) [SHOW MORE]
5 is an algebraic integer. Steps (3), (4) [SHOW MORE]
6 is the sum of many roots of unity (not necessarily all distinct), namely, the eigenvalues of the corresponding element .. Fact (3) is finite. [SHOW MORE]
7 Every algebraic conjugate of is also a sum of roots of unity. Step (6) [SHOW MORE]
8 Every algebraic conjugate of has modulus less than or equal to . Step (7) [SHOW MORE]
9 The modulus of the algebraic norm of in a Galois extension containing it is either 0 or 1. Steps (5), (8) [SHOW MORE]
10 If the modulus of the algebraic norm of is , then [SHOW MORE]
11 If the modulus of the algebraic norm of is , then is a scalar matrix. Steps (6), (8) [SHOW MORE]
12 Either or is scalar. Steps (9), (10), (11) Step-combination direct.