Coset containment implies subgroup containment

From Groupprops
Revision as of 19:31, 19 October 2010 by Vipul (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

DIRECT: The fact or result stated in this article has a trivial/direct/straightforward proof provided we use the correct definitions of the terms involved
View other results with direct proofs
VIEW FACTS USING THIS: directly | directly or indirectly, upto two steps | directly or indirectly, upto three steps|
VIEW: Survey articles about this

Statement

Verbal statement

If a Left coset (?) of one subgroup is contained in a left coset of another subgroup, then the subgroup is also contained in the other.

Statement with symbols

Suppose xHyK are cosets of subgroups H,KG. Then HK.

Related facts

Proof

Given: xHyK for some x,yG.

To prove: HK

Proof: Since x=xe is in xH, which is contained in yK, there exists k1K such that x=yk1. Thus yk1HyK, which implies that there exist hH and k2K such that yk1h=yk2. Hence h=k2k11, which is in K. So, HK.