Centralizer-free ideal implies automorphism-faithful

From Groupprops
Revision as of 21:35, 26 July 2009 by Vipul (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Lie subring property implication| stronger = centralizer-free ideal| weaker = automorphism-faithful Lie subring}} {{analogue of fact| old generic context = group| new generic c…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two Lie subring properties. That is, it states that every Lie subring satisfying the first Lie subring property (i.e., centralizer-free ideal) must also satisfy the second Lie subring property (i.e., automorphism-faithful Lie subring)
View all Lie subring property implications | View all Lie subring property non-implications
Get more facts about centralizer-free ideal|Get more facts about automorphism-faithful Lie subring

ANALOGY: This is an analogue in Lie rings of a fact encountered in group. The old fact is: normal and centralizer-free implies automorphism-faithful.
Another analogue to the same fact, in the same new context, is: centralizer-free ideal implies derivation-faithful
View other analogues of normal and centralizer-free implies automorphism-faithful|View other analogues from group to Lie ring (OR, View as a tabulated list)

Statement

Suppose is a Lie ring and is a centralizer-free ideal of , i.e., is an ideal of and its centralizer in is zero. Then, is an automorphism-faithful Lie subring (and hence an automorphism-faithful ideal) of : Any non-identity automorphism of that restricts to an automorphism of restricts to a non-identity automorphism of .

Related facts

Similar facts for Lie rings

Analogues in groups

Proof

Given: A Lie ring , a centralizer-free ideal of . An automorphism of such that the restriction of to is the identity map.

To prove: for all .

Proof: By the definition of automorphism, we have, for every :

.

Since is an ideal and , . Thus, . Also, . We thus have:

.

By the biadditivity of the Lie bracket, this gives:

.

In other words, . By assumption, , so , completing the proof.