Nilpotent ideal is in nullspace for Killing form

From Groupprops
Revision as of 15:23, 18 July 2009 by Vipul (talk | contribs) (→‎Related facts)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Statement

Suppose F is a field, L is a Lie algebra over F, κ is the Killing form (?) on L, and A is a Nilpotent ideal (?) of L. Then, for xA,yL, κ(x,y)=0.

Related facts

Weaker facts

Other related facts

Facts used

  1. Lower central series members are derivation-invariant
  2. Derivation-invariant subring of ideal implies ideal

Proof

Given: A field F, a Lie algebra L over F, a class c-nilpotent ideal A of L. κ is the Killing form on L.

To prove: For xA,yL, κ(x,y)=0.

Proof: Consider:

ad(x)(ad(y)ad(x))c.

The right-most ad(x) sends any element of L inside A, since A is an ideal. ad(y) again sends this inside A, since A is an ideal.

The next ad(x) now sends the element inside [A,A]. Since [A,A] is a derivation-invariant subring of A (fact (1)) which is an ideal in L, [A,A] is an ideal in L (fact (2)). So ad(y) sends the element within [A,A].

Inductively, after d steps, the element is in [[A,A],A],,A] with d As. Applying ad(x) sends it to [[A,A],A] with d+1 As. This is a derivation-invariant subring of A which is an ideal of L, so it is an ideal of L. So ad(y) preserves it.

Thus, (ad(y)ad(x)) is in Ac=[[A,A],,A] where A is repeated c times. Applying ad(x) to this sends it to Ac+1, which is zero since A has class c. Thus:

ad(x)(ad(y)ad(x))c=0

From this, we get that (ad(x)ad(y))c+1=0. Thus, ad(x)ad(y) is nilpotent, so it has trace zero, so κ(x,y)=0.