Permutability is not finite-intersection-closed
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a subgroup property (i.e., permutable subgroup) not satisfying a subgroup metaproperty (i.e., finite-intersection-closed subgroup property).
View all subgroup metaproperty dissatisfactions | View all subgroup metaproperty satisfactions|Get help on looking up metaproperty (dis)satisfactions for subgroup properties
Get more facts about permutable subgroup|Get more facts about finite-intersection-closed subgroup property|
Statement
Verbal statement
The intersection of two permutable subgroups of a group need not be permutable.
Symbolic statement
It is possible to find a group and subgroups and of such that and are both permutable subgroups (viz quasinormal subgroups) but is not.
Proof
Construction of the counterexample
Setup: Let be an odd prime.
- is a group generated by two elements subject to the relations and . Alternatively is the semidirect product of the additive group modulo by the multiplicative group of order in the multiplicative group of automorphisms. Note that is a non-Abelian group of order .
- is a cyclic group of order , generated by an element .
- .
- .
We claim that: , and , give the required counterexample.
Proof of the claim
is permutable: is a direct factor of so it is clearly a normal subgroup and hence a permutable subgroup.
is permutable: Since permutability satisfies the inverse image condition, we see that if is permutable in , then is permutable in . Thus, it suffices to show that is permutable as a subgroup of . This can easily be checked by verifying that commutes with all the cyclic subgroups of . (a proof of this is provided in an example for permutable not implies normal).
is not permutable: Consider the cyclic subgroup generated by . The claim is that . To prove this notice that . This is clearly not in .
Further fact shown by the example
This example shows some further facts:
- The intersection of a permutable subgroup with a direct factor need not be a permutable subgroup. In this example, for instance, is a direct factor, but its intersection with is still not a permutable subgroup.
- A permutable subgroup of a direct factor need not be a permutable subgroup. In this case is a permutable subgroup inside , which itself is a direct factor.
- Permutability is not a direct product-closed subgroup property