Three subgroup lemma: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
No edit summary
m (4 revisions)
(No difference)

Revision as of 00:26, 8 May 2008

This fact is related to: commutator calculus
View other facts related to commutator calculus | View terms related to commutator calculus

This article describes a fact or result that is not basic but it still well-established and standard. The fact may involve terms that are themselves non-basic
View other semi-basic facts in group theory
VIEW FACTS USING THIS: directly | directly or indirectly, upto two steps | directly or indirectly, upto three steps|
VIEW: Survey articles about this

Statement

Symbolic statement

Let A,B,C be three subgroups of G. Then any two of the three statements below implies the third:

Proof

The three subgroup lemma follows from Witt's identity.

Corollaries

If G is a perfect group and N is a subgroup of G such that [[G,N],N] is trivial, then [G,N] is trivial.

This result has an analogue in the theory of Lie algebras.