Three subgroup lemma: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (4 revisions) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 00:26, 8 May 2008
This fact is related to: commutator calculus
View other facts related to commutator calculus | View terms related to commutator calculus
This article describes a fact or result that is not basic but it still well-established and standard. The fact may involve terms that are themselves non-basic
View other semi-basic facts in group theory
VIEW FACTS USING THIS: directly | directly or indirectly, upto two steps | directly or indirectly, upto three steps|
VIEW: Survey articles about this
Statement
Symbolic statement
Let be three subgroups of . Then any two of the three statements below implies the third:
Proof
The three subgroup lemma follows from Witt's identity.
Corollaries
If is a perfect group and is a subgroup of such that is trivial, then is trivial.
This result has an analogue in the theory of Lie algebras.