Powering-invariance is not quotient-transitive: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Proof) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Proof== | ==Proof== | ||
The proof idea is follows: use the construction in the reference for <math>H</math>. Now take <math>K</math> as a subgroup containing <math>H</math> such that <math>K/H</math> is a finite cyclic group of order | The proof idea is follows: use the construction in the reference for <math>H</math>. Now take <math>K</math> as a subgroup containing <math>H</math> such that <math>K/H</math> is a finite cyclic group of order <math>n > 1</math>. Now: | ||
* <math>H</math> is powering-invariant in <math>G</math> by construction, since both <math>G</math> and <math>H</math> are [[rationally powered group]]s. | * <math>H</math> is powering-invariant in <math>G</math> by construction, since both <math>G</math> and <math>H</math> are [[rationally powered group]]s. | ||
* <math>K/H</math> is powering-invariant in <math>G/H</math> since <math>G/H</math> is not powered over ''any'' prime. | * <math>K/H</math> is powering-invariant in <math>G/H</math> since <math>G/H</math> is not powered over ''any'' prime. | ||
* <math>K</math> is not powering-invariant in <math>G</math>: For instance, | * <math>K</math> is not powering-invariant in <math>G</math>: For instance, an element of <math>K</math> whose image in <math>K/H</math> generates the latter group does not have a <math>n^{th}</math> root in <math>K</math>. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
* {{mathoverflow|number = 121552|title = Normal subgroup that is invariant under powering such that the quotient group is not invariant}} | * {{mathoverflow|number = 121552|title = Normal subgroup that is invariant under powering such that the quotient group is not invariant}} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:00, 19 December 2014
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a subgroup property (i.e., powering-invariant subgroup) not satisfying a subgroup metaproperty (i.e., quotient-transitive subgroup property).
View all subgroup metaproperty dissatisfactions | View all subgroup metaproperty satisfactions|Get help on looking up metaproperty (dis)satisfactions for subgroup properties
Get more facts about powering-invariant subgroup|Get more facts about quotient-transitive subgroup property|
Statement
It is possible to have groups such that is a powering-invariant normal subgroup of and is a powering-invariant subgroup of the quotient group , but is not powering-invariant in .
Related facts
- Powering-invariant over quotient-powering-invariant implies powering-invariant
- Quotient-powering-invariance is quotient-transitive
Proof
The proof idea is follows: use the construction in the reference for . Now take as a subgroup containing such that is a finite cyclic group of order . Now:
- is powering-invariant in by construction, since both and are rationally powered groups.
- is powering-invariant in since is not powered over any prime.
- is not powering-invariant in : For instance, an element of whose image in generates the latter group does not have a root in .