Powering-invariance is not quotient-transitive: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
No edit summary
 
Line 14: Line 14:
==Proof==
==Proof==


The proof idea is follows: use the construction in the reference for <math>H</math>. Now take <math>K</math> as a subgroup containing <math>H</math> such that <math>K/H</math> is a finite cyclic group of order greater than 1. Now:
The proof idea is follows: use the construction in the reference for <math>H</math>. Now take <math>K</math> as a subgroup containing <math>H</math> such that <math>K/H</math> is a finite cyclic group of order <math>n > 1</math>. Now:


* <math>H</math> is powering-invariant in <math>G</math> by construction, since both <math>G</math> and <math>H</math> are [[rationally powered group]]s.
* <math>H</math> is powering-invariant in <math>G</math> by construction, since both <math>G</math> and <math>H</math> are [[rationally powered group]]s.
* <math>K/H</math> is powering-invariant in <math>G/H</math> since <math>G/H</math> is not powered over ''any'' prime.
* <math>K/H</math> is powering-invariant in <math>G/H</math> since <math>G/H</math> is not powered over ''any'' prime.
* <math>K</math> is not powering-invariant in <math>G</math>: For instance, any element in the coset of <math>H</math> in <math>K</math> other than <math>H</math> cannot have a square root in <math>K</math>, even though <math>G</math> is 2-powered.
* <math>K</math> is not powering-invariant in <math>G</math>: For instance, an element of <math>K</math> whose image in <math>K/H</math> generates the latter group does not have a <math>n^{th}</math> root in <math>K</math>.


==References==
==References==


* {{mathoverflow|number = 121552|title = Normal subgroup that is invariant under powering such that the quotient group is not invariant}}
* {{mathoverflow|number = 121552|title = Normal subgroup that is invariant under powering such that the quotient group is not invariant}}

Latest revision as of 16:00, 19 December 2014

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a subgroup property (i.e., powering-invariant subgroup) not satisfying a subgroup metaproperty (i.e., quotient-transitive subgroup property).
View all subgroup metaproperty dissatisfactions | View all subgroup metaproperty satisfactions|Get help on looking up metaproperty (dis)satisfactions for subgroup properties
Get more facts about powering-invariant subgroup|Get more facts about quotient-transitive subgroup property|

Statement

It is possible to have groups HKG such that H is a powering-invariant normal subgroup of G and K/H is a powering-invariant subgroup of the quotient group G/H, but K is not powering-invariant in G.

Related facts

Proof

The proof idea is follows: use the construction in the reference for H. Now take K as a subgroup containing H such that K/H is a finite cyclic group of order n>1. Now:

  • H is powering-invariant in G by construction, since both G and H are rationally powered groups.
  • K/H is powering-invariant in G/H since G/H is not powered over any prime.
  • K is not powering-invariant in G: For instance, an element of K whose image in K/H generates the latter group does not have a nth root in K.

References