Powering-invariance is union-closed: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 5: Line 5:
==Statement==
==Statement==


Suppose <math>G</math> is a [[group]] and <math>H_i,i \in I</math> is a collection of [[powering-invariant subgroup]]s of <math>G</math>. Suppose the union <math>\bigcup_{i \in I} H_i</math> is a [[subgroup]] of <math>G</math> (and hence is also the same as the [[join of subgroups]] <math>\langle H_i \rangle_{i \in I}</math>. Then, this union of also a powering-invariant subgroup of <math>G</math>.
Suppose <math>G</math> is a [[group]] and <math>H_i,i \in I</math> is a collection of [[powering-invariant subgroup]]s of <math>G</math>. Suppose the union <math>\bigcup_{i \in I} H_i</math> is a [[subgroup]] of <math>G</math> (and hence is also the same as the [[join of subgroups]] <math>\langle H_i \rangle_{i \in I}</math>). Then, this union of also a powering-invariant subgroup of <math>G</math>.


==Related facts==
==Related facts==

Latest revision as of 02:00, 17 February 2013

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a subgroup property (i.e., powering-invariant subgroup) satisfying a subgroup metaproperty (i.e., union-closed subgroup property)
View all subgroup metaproperty satisfactions | View all subgroup metaproperty dissatisfactions |Get help on looking up metaproperty (dis)satisfactions for subgroup properties
Get more facts about powering-invariant subgroup |Get facts that use property satisfaction of powering-invariant subgroup | Get facts that use property satisfaction of powering-invariant subgroup|Get more facts about union-closed subgroup property


Statement

Suppose G is a group and Hi,iI is a collection of powering-invariant subgroups of G. Suppose the union iIHi is a subgroup of G (and hence is also the same as the join of subgroups HiiI). Then, this union of also a powering-invariant subgroup of G.

Related facts

Proof

Given: G is a group and Hi,iI is a collection of powering-invariant subgroups of G. The union H=iIHi is a subgroup of G. G is powered over a prime p. An element gH.

To prove: There exists xH such that xp=g.

Proof:

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 There exists iI such that gHi. H is the union of Hi,iI, gH. Follows directly from given.
2 Hi is p-powered. G is p-powered, Hi is powering-invariant in G. Directly from given data used.
3 There exists xHi such that xp=g. Steps (1), (2) direct from steps.
4 There exists xH such that xp=g. H is the union of Hi,iI Step (3) Step-given direct.