Powering-invariance is union-closed: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Statement== | ==Statement== | ||
Suppose <math>G</math> is a [[group]] and <math>H_i,i \in I</math> is a collection of [[powering-invariant subgroup]]s of <math>G</math>. Suppose the union <math>\bigcup_{i \in I} H_i</math> is a [[subgroup]] of <math>G</math> (and hence is also the same as the [[join of subgroups]] <math>\langle H_i \rangle_{i \in I}</math>. Then, this union of also a powering-invariant subgroup of <math>G</math>. | Suppose <math>G</math> is a [[group]] and <math>H_i,i \in I</math> is a collection of [[powering-invariant subgroup]]s of <math>G</math>. Suppose the union <math>\bigcup_{i \in I} H_i</math> is a [[subgroup]] of <math>G</math> (and hence is also the same as the [[join of subgroups]] <math>\langle H_i \rangle_{i \in I}</math>). Then, this union of also a powering-invariant subgroup of <math>G</math>. | ||
==Related facts== | ==Related facts== | ||
Latest revision as of 02:00, 17 February 2013
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a subgroup property (i.e., powering-invariant subgroup) satisfying a subgroup metaproperty (i.e., union-closed subgroup property)
View all subgroup metaproperty satisfactions | View all subgroup metaproperty dissatisfactions |Get help on looking up metaproperty (dis)satisfactions for subgroup properties
Get more facts about powering-invariant subgroup |Get facts that use property satisfaction of powering-invariant subgroup | Get facts that use property satisfaction of powering-invariant subgroup|Get more facts about union-closed subgroup property
Statement
Suppose is a group and is a collection of powering-invariant subgroups of . Suppose the union is a subgroup of (and hence is also the same as the join of subgroups ). Then, this union of also a powering-invariant subgroup of .
Related facts
Proof
Given: is a group and is a collection of powering-invariant subgroups of . The union is a subgroup of . is powered over a prime . An element .
To prove: There exists such that .
Proof:
| Step no. | Assertion/construction | Facts used | Given data used | Previous steps used | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | There exists such that . | is the union of , . | Follows directly from given. | ||
| 2 | is -powered. | is -powered, is powering-invariant in . | Directly from given data used. | ||
| 3 | There exists such that . | Steps (1), (2) | direct from steps. | ||
| 4 | There exists such that . | is the union of | Step (3) | Step-given direct. |