Associative binary operation: Difference between revisions
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
! Invariant !! Value !! Significance | ! Invariant !! Value !! Significance | ||
|- | |- | ||
| minimum number of variables in terms of which the identity can be expressed || | | minimum number of variables in terms of which the identity can be expressed || 3 || A [[magma]] is associative if and only if the submagma generated by any <math>3</math> elements is associative; nothing smaller than <math>3</math> works | ||
|- | |- | ||
| degree of the identity in each variable || | | if homogeneous, then total degree || 3 || The associative law is homogeneous of degree three, i.e., all expressions are products of length three. This allows us to use the techniques of operad theory. For more, see [[associativity operad]]. | ||
|- | |||
| degree of the identity in each variable || 1 || when this identity is viewed for the multiplicative operation of a ring or algebra, it is a ''linear'' identity in each variable. In particular, the set of values for each variable such that the identity holds for all values of the other variables is an additive subgroup. | |||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 19:45, 20 June 2012
This article defines a property of binary operations (and hence, of magmas)
Definition
Definition in infix notation
Let be a set and be a binary operation on (viz, is a map ), making a magma. We denote using infix notation, so that its application to is denoted . Then, is said to be associative if, for every in , the following identity holds:
where equality holds as elements of .
Note that are allowed to be equal or distinct. In particular, the above holds when all are equal, all are distinct, or two are equal and the third distinct.
Detailed explanation of expressions and their interpretation: The left side expression is termed the left associated expression for and is interpreted and evaluated as follows. We first consider . Since , we have . We now consider the elements . Since both of these are in , .
The right side expression is termed the right associated expression for and is interpreted and evaluated as follows. Since , we have . We consider consider the elements . Since both of these are in , .
If, for a given , the left associated expression and the right associated expression are equal, are said to associate. Associativity basically says that every ordered triple of elements associates.
Definition in usual function notation
Let be a set and be a binary operation. We say that is associative if it satisfies the following for all :
We see that the condition feels a lot less intuitive in function notation than with the infix notation, which is why infix notation is generally preferred for describing associativity in the context of binary operations.
Related term
A set equipped with an associative binary operation is termed a semigroup. If, further, there is a neutral element (identity element) for the associative binary operation, the set is termed a monoid.
Numerical invariants
The associative law is typically viewed as a universally quantified identity. In this context, we discuss some invariants that can be associated with the identity.
Invariant | Value | Significance |
---|---|---|
minimum number of variables in terms of which the identity can be expressed | 3 | A magma is associative if and only if the submagma generated by any elements is associative; nothing smaller than works |
if homogeneous, then total degree | 3 | The associative law is homogeneous of degree three, i.e., all expressions are products of length three. This allows us to use the techniques of operad theory. For more, see associativity operad. |
degree of the identity in each variable | 1 | when this identity is viewed for the multiplicative operation of a ring or algebra, it is a linear identity in each variable. In particular, the set of values for each variable such that the identity holds for all values of the other variables is an additive subgroup. |
Facts
Parenthesization can be dropped
For full proof, refer: Associative implies generalized associative
When a binary operation is associative, it turns out that we can drop parenthesization from products of many elements. That is, given an expression of the form:
any choice of bracketing will give the same result.
The result is proved by induction, with the base case () following from the definition of associativity.
As an illustration, suppose we want to show that:
Then, we apply associativity in a chain:
For this reason, we always use infix operator symbols for associative binary operations, and often even drop the operator symbol, so that the above expression is just written as: .
Also, the re-parenthesization identities (i.e., all identities that are special cases of generalized associativity) are the only identities that can be proved using associativity.
Associativity pentagon
Further information: Associativity pentagon
The associativity pentagon is a pentagon whose vertices are the five different ways of associating a product of length four, with an edge between two vertices if moving from one to the other requires a single application of the associative law. This is a cyclic pentagon. The associativity pentagon is significant because, loosely, it generates all relations between the different ways of applying the associativity law to re-parenthesize expressions. It also helps to prove results about the set of left-associative, middle-associative, and right-associative elements. It is also related to the associator identity.
Associator on a non-associative ring and the associator identity
Further information: associator on a non-associative ring
For a non-associative ring with multiplication , we can define the associator as:
This is linear in each of its variables.
Inverses are unique
In a monoid (that is, a set with associative binary operation having a neutral element) any left inverse and right inverse of an element must be equal. Hence, the inverse of an element, if it exists, must be unique. For full proof, refer: Equality of left and right inverses in monoid
Related element properties
Left-associative element
An element is said to be left-associative with respect to a binary operation if any ordered triple starting with that element associates.
The set of left-associative elements in any magma is a subsemigroup, and if the magma contains a neutral element, it is a submonoid.
For full proof, refer: Left-associative elements of magma form submagma
Middle-associative element
An element is said to be middle-associative with respect to a binary operation if any ordered triple with that element in the middle, associates.
The set of middle-associative elements in any magma is a subsemigroup, and if the magma contains a neutral element, it is a submonoid.
For full proof, refer: Middle-associative elements of magma form submagma
Right associative element
An element is said to be right-associative with respect to a binary operation if any ordered triple ending with that element associates.
The set of right associative elements in any magma is a subsemigroup, and if the magma contains a neutral element, it is a submonoid.
For full proof, refer: Right-associative elements of magma form submagma
Associative element
Further information: associative element
An element is said to be associative if it is left, middle and right associative. The set of associative elements forms a submagma (which contains the neutral element if it exists) termed the associative center (or sometimes, the nucleus) of the magma.
Weaker identities
Identities obtained directly by duplicating variables
Algebraic formulation of identity | Name of identity | Name of magma satisfying identity | Name of non-associative ring satisfying identity |
---|---|---|---|
left-alternativity | left-alternative magma | left-alternative ring | |
right-alternativity | right-alternative magma | right-alternative ring | |
flexibility | flexible magma | flexible ring | |
? | magma in which cubes are well-defined | ring in which cubes are well-defined |
Identities obtained from generalized associativity by duplicating variables
We here discuss identities with products of length at most four:
Algebraic formulation of identity | Name of identity | Name of magma satisfying identity | Name of non-associative ring satisfying identity |
---|---|---|---|
Jordan's identity | ? (if we also assume commutativity, then Jordan magma) | ? (if we also assume commutativity, then Jordan ring) | |
One of Moufang's identities | ? | ? | |
One of Moufang's identities | ? | ? | |
One of Moufang's identities | ? | ? |