Character orthogonality theorem: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
Line 58: Line 58:
<math>\langle \chi_1, \chi_1 \rangle = d</math>
<math>\langle \chi_1, \chi_1 \rangle = d</math>


where <math>d = 1</math> if <math>k</math> is a splitting field and in general <math>d</math> is the number of irreducible constituents (with multiplicites) of <math>\chi_1</math> when taken over a splitting field). Also:
where <math>d = 1</math> if <math>k</math> is a [[splitting field]] for <math>G</math> and in general <math>d</math> is the number of irreducible constituents (with multiplicites) of <math>\chi_1</math> when taken over a splitting field. Also:


<math>\langle \chi_1, \chi_2 \rangle = 0</math>
<math>\langle \chi_1, \chi_2 \rangle = 0</math>

Revision as of 03:34, 13 July 2011

This fact is related to: linear representation theory
View other facts related to linear representation theory | View terms related to linear representation theory

This article describes an orthogonality theorem. View a list of orthogonality theorems

Name

This result is known as the first orthogonality theorem, character orthogonality theorem or row orthogonality theorem.

Statement

Statement over complex numbers

Let G be a finite group and C denote the field of complex numbers. Let z¯ denote the complex conjugate of z. Then, if ρ1 and ρ2 are two inequivalent irreducible linear representations, and χ1 and χ2 are their characters, we have:

gGχ1(g)χ2(g)¯=0

and:

gGχ1(g)χ1(g)¯=|G|

Statement over complex numbers in terms of inner product of class functions

For information on the Hermitian inner product, see Inner product of functions#Hermitian inner product over the complex numbers

Consider the space of complex-valued functions GC. This is a C-vector space in a natural way, with basis being the indicator functions of elements of G. Consider the Hermitian inner product on this vector space given by:

f1,f2=1|G|gGf1(g)f2(g)¯

Then, the characters form an orthonormal set of functions with respect to this basis. In other words, if χ1,χ2 are the characters of inequivalent irreducible representations, we get:

χ1,χ1=1

and

χ1,χ2=0

Statement over general fields

Let G be a finite group and k a field whose characteristic does not divide the order of G. Let ρ1 and ρ2 be two inequivalent irreducible linear representations of G over k and let χ1 and χ2 denote their characters. Then, the following are true:

gGχ1(g)χ2(g1)=0

And:

gGχ1(g)χ1(g1)=d|G|

where d=1 if the field k is a splitting field for G (for instance, if k is sufficiently large for G, viz., contains all the mth roots of 1 where m is the exponent of G).

When k is not a splitting field, d is the number of irreducible constituents (with multiplicities) of χ1 when taken over a splitting field containing k.

Statement over general fields in terms of inner product of class functions

For more on this inner product definition, see Inner product of functions#Bilinear form

For functions f1,f2:Gk, define the following inner product:

f1,f2=1|G|gGf1(g)f2(g1)

Then, if χ1,χ2 are the characters of inequivalent irreducible representations, we get:

χ1,χ1=d

where d=1 if k is a splitting field for G and in general d is the number of irreducible constituents (with multiplicites) of χ1 when taken over a splitting field. Also:

χ1,χ2=0

Interpretation in characteristic zero and prime characteristic

In characteristic zero, both sides are being viewed as elements in a field of characteristic zero.

In prime characteristic, however, the inner product is taking values modulo the prime characteristic, hence is not actually an integer, whereas the right side (1, 0, or d) is an integer, which needs to be reduced modulo the prime to be interpreted on the other side.

Relation between the Hermitian inner product and the bilinear inner product

See inner product of functions#Relation between the definitions. The upshot is that both inner products are different but it does not matter if the input functions are characters.

Consequences