Associative algebra: Difference between revisions
| No edit summary | No edit summary | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| In the particular case when <math>R</math> and <math>A</math> are both unital rings, this is equivalent to saying that we require an embedding of <math>R</math> as a sub (unital ring) of <math>A</math>. | In the particular case when <math>R</math> and <math>A</math> are both unital rings, this is equivalent to saying that we require an embedding of <math>R</math> as a sub (unital ring) of <math>A</math>. | ||
| We typically studiy algebras over a field, which are just vector spaces over the field equipped with a suitable compatible multiplication. | |||
| Sometimes, we also look at the ''non-associative'' notion of algebra, where we do not even assume associativity of the multiplication for <math>A</math> | |||
| ==Related notions== | ==Related notions== | ||
Revision as of 14:51, 8 June 2007
Definition
An algebra over a base ring is defined as a ring , along with the structure of a -module to .
In the particular case when and are both unital rings, this is equivalent to saying that we require an embedding of as a sub (unital ring) of .
We typically studiy algebras over a field, which are just vector spaces over the field equipped with a suitable compatible multiplication.
Sometimes, we also look at the non-associative notion of algebra, where we do not even assume associativity of the multiplication for