Isomorphic iff potentially conjugate in finite: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Proof) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
The restriction of <math>\alpha</math> to <math>H</math> is <math>\sigma</math>. Further, pick right coset representatives for <math>H,K</math> in <math>G</math> such that the identity element is the coset representative of the subgroups themselves. Now, define <math>\alpha</math> as a bijection between these sets of coset representatives such that <math>\alpha</math> sends the identity element to the identity element. Finally, for any element of the form <math>xh</math>, with <math>x</math> a coset representative of <math>H</math> and <math>h \in H</math>, define <math>\alpha(hx) = \sigma(h)\alpha(x)</math>. | The restriction of <math>\alpha</math> to <math>H</math> is <math>\sigma</math>. Further, pick right coset representatives for <math>H,K</math> in <math>G</math> such that the identity element is the coset representative of the subgroups themselves. Now, define <math>\alpha</math> as a bijection between these sets of coset representatives such that <math>\alpha</math> sends the identity element to the identity element. Finally, for any element of the form <math>xh</math>, with <math>x</math> a coset representative of <math>H</math> and <math>h \in H</math>, define <math>\alpha(hx) = \sigma(h)\alpha(x)</math>. | ||
We verify that this works. Pick <math>h \in H</math> and an element <math>g \in G</math>. Write <math>g = kx</math>, with <math>x</math> a coset representative of <math>K</math> and <math>k \in K</math>. We want to show that <math>l_{\sigma(h)}(kx) = \alpha(l_h(\alpha^{-1}(kx)))</math>. | We verify that this works. Pick <math>h \in H</math> and an element <math>g \in G</math>. Write <math>g = kx</math>, with <math>x</math> a coset representative of <math>K</math> and <math>k \in K</math>. Let <math>l_a</math> denote the left multiplication by <math>a</math>. We want to show that <math>l_{\sigma(h)}(kx) = \alpha(l_h(\alpha^{-1}(kx)))</math>. | ||
The left side is <math>\sigma(h)kx</math>. For the right side, note that <math>\alpha(\sigma^{-1}k\alpha^{-1}(x)) = kx</math>, so <math>\alpha^{-1}(kx) = \sigma^{-1}(k)\alpha^{-1}(x)</math>, with <math>\sigma^{-1}(k) \in H</math> and <math>\alpha^{-1}(x)</math> a right coset representative of <math>H</math>. Thus, the right side is <math>\alpha(h\sigma^{-1}(k)\alpha^{-1}(x))</math>. Since <math>h \sigma^{-1}(k) \in H</math> and <math>\alpha^{-1}(x)</math> is a right coset representative, we get that <math>\alpha(h\sigma^{-1}(k)\alpha^{-1}(x)) = \sigma(h)kx</math>. This equals the left side, so the proof is completed. | The left side is <math>\sigma(h)kx</math>. For the right side, note that <math>\alpha(\sigma^{-1}k\alpha^{-1}(x)) = kx</math>, so <math>\alpha^{-1}(kx) = \sigma^{-1}(k)\alpha^{-1}(x)</math>, with <math>\sigma^{-1}(k) \in H</math> and <math>\alpha^{-1}(x)</math> a right coset representative of <math>H</math>. Thus, the right side is <math>\alpha(h\sigma^{-1}(k)\alpha^{-1}(x))</math>. Since <math>h \sigma^{-1}(k) \in H</math> and <math>\alpha^{-1}(x)</math> is a right coset representative, we get that <math>\alpha(h\sigma^{-1}(k)\alpha^{-1}(x)) = \sigma(h)kx</math>. This equals the left side, so the proof is completed. | ||
Revision as of 11:46, 25 June 2009
Statement
With one isomorphism
Suppose is a finite group and is an isomorphism between two subgroups of . Then, there exists a finite group containing and an element such that for any .
With multiple isomorphisms
Suppose is a finite group and is a collection of isomorphisms between subgroups of , with . Then, there exists a finite group containing and elements such that for any .
Related facts
- Isomorphic iff potentially conjugate: The general version for infinite groups. Note that the proof outlined in the finite case does not work directly for infinite groups, because the finite groups version uses the fact that isomorphic subgroups have the same index.
- Equivalence of definitions of order statistics-equivalent finite groups: Two finite groups that have the same order statistics can be embedded in a symmetric group in such a way that for every conjugacy class of the symmetric group, the intersection of both groups with the conjugacy class has the same size. Conversely, if two finite groups can be embedded in any big group with this property, they have the same order statistics.
Proof
With one isomorphism
Let be the symmetric group on the set with viewed as a subgroup of via the left multiplication action (this is the embedding given by Cayley's theorem). Under this embedding, the isomorphism lifts to an inner automorphism given by conjugation by a permutation constructed as follows.
The restriction of to is . Further, pick right coset representatives for in such that the identity element is the coset representative of the subgroups themselves. Now, define as a bijection between these sets of coset representatives such that sends the identity element to the identity element. Finally, for any element of the form , with a coset representative of and , define .
We verify that this works. Pick and an element . Write , with a coset representative of and . Let denote the left multiplication by . We want to show that .
The left side is . For the right side, note that , so , with and a right coset representative of . Thus, the right side is . Since and is a right coset representative, we get that . This equals the left side, so the proof is completed.
With multiple isomorphisms
Since is finite, so is the set of isomorphisms. Without loss of generality, . The rough idea is that each time we take the symmetric group on the set, we can convert one isomorphism to an inner automorphism. Thus, repeating the process times yields a finite group in which all the isomorphisms are realized as inner automorphisms.
The new finite group has order , where is the factorial function. This grows very rapidly with for . For instance, is which is a number with several thousand digits.