Sylow's theorem: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
# '''Existence''': There exists a <math>p</math>-Sylow subgroup <math>P</math> of <math>G</math> | # '''Existence''': There exists a <math>p</math>-Sylow subgroup <math>P</math> of <math>G</math> | ||
# '''Conjugacy''': If <math>P</math> and <math>Q</math> are <math>p</math>-Sylow subgroups of <math>G</math> then there exists <math>g</math> in <math>G</math> such that <math>gPg^{-1} = Q</math> | # '''Conjugacy''': If <math>P</math> and <math>Q</math> are <math>p</math>-Sylow subgroups of <math>G</math> then there exists <math>g</math> in <math>G</math> such that <math>gPg^{-1} = Q</math> (i.e., <math>P</math> and <math>Q</math> are [[conjugate subgroups]]) | ||
# '''Domination''': Let <math>P</math> be a <math>p</math>-Sylow subgroup and <math>Q</math> a <math>p</math>-group. Then there exists a <math>g</math> in <math>G</math> such that <math>gQg^{-1} \subseteq P</math>. | # '''Domination''': Let <math>P</math> be a <math>p</math>-Sylow subgroup and <math>Q</math> a <math>p</math>-group. Then there exists a <math>g</math> in <math>G</math> such that <math>gQg^{-1} \subseteq P</math>. | ||
# '''Congruence''': Let <math>Syl_p(G)</math> denote the set of <math>p</math>-Sylow subgroups of <math>G</math> and <math>n_p</math> denote the cardinality of <math>Syl_p(G)</math>. Then, <math>n_p \equiv 1\mod p</math>. | # '''Congruence''': Let <math>Syl_p(G)</math> denote the set of <math>p</math>-Sylow subgroups of <math>G</math> and <math>n_p</math> denote the cardinality of <math>Syl_p(G)</math>. Then, <math>n_p \equiv 1\mod p</math>. | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
There are other corollaries too, many of which factor through these corollaries. | There are other corollaries too, many of which factor through these corollaries. | ||
===Similar statements=== | |||
* [[Sylow's theorem in profinite groups]] | |||
==Proof breakup== | ==Proof breakup== | ||
Revision as of 22:45, 5 October 2008
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in group theory.
View a complete list of basic facts in group theory
VIEW FACTS USING THIS: directly | directly or indirectly, upto two steps | directly or indirectly, upto three steps|
VIEW: Survey articles about this
This fact is related to: Sylow theory
View other facts related to Sylow theory | View terms related to Sylow theory
For survey articles related to this, refer: Category:Survey articles related to Sylow theory
Statement
Verbal statement
The Sylow's theorem(s) give(s) information about the existence of -Sylow subgroups of a finite group, as well as the relation among them. More specifically, given a finite group:
- Existence: For any prime , there exists a -Sylow subgroup
- Conjugacy: Any two -Sylow subgroups are conjugate in the whole group
- Domination: Any -subgroup is contained inside some -Sylow subgroup
- Congruence: The number of -Sylow subgroups divides the index of any -Sylow subgroup and is also congruent to modulo .
Statement with symbols
Let be a finite group and a prime. A subgroup of is termed a -Sylow subgroup if its order is a power of and its index is relatively prime to . Note that by Lagrange's theorem, the order of a Sylow subgroup is the largest power of dividing the order of , and thus, it is a multiple of the order of any -subgroup (subgroup whose order is a power of ) of .
Then Sylow's theorem states that:
- Existence: There exists a -Sylow subgroup of
- Conjugacy: If and are -Sylow subgroups of then there exists in such that (i.e., and are conjugate subgroups)
- Domination: Let be a -Sylow subgroup and a -group. Then there exists a in such that .
- Congruence: Let denote the set of -Sylow subgroups of and denote the cardinality of . Then, .
Related facts
Corollaries
- Sylow implies order-conjugate
- Sylow implies order-isomorphic
- Sylow implies isomorph-automorphic
- Sylow implies automorph-conjugate
- Sylow implies isomorph-conjugate
- Sylow implies intermediately isomorph-conjugate
- Sylow implies intermediately automorph-conjugate
- Sylow implies pronormal
There are other corollaries too, many of which factor through these corollaries.
Similar statements
Proof breakup
- Existence: For full proof, refer: Sylow subgroups exist
- Conjugacy: This follows from Domination, though it can also be proved through the methods used to establish Congruence. For full proof, refer: Sylow implies order-conjugate
- Domination: For full proof, refer: Sylow implies order-dominating
- Congruence: For full proof, refer: Congruence condition on Sylow numbers
References
Journal references
- Théorèmes sur les groupes de substitutions by Ludwig Sylow, Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 5, (1872), no. 4, 584-594 Springerlink pageArchived local copy: The original formulation of Sylow's theorem by Sylow. Does not include the congruence condition part of the theorem, which was proved later by Frobenius.More info
- Sur les groupes transitifs dont le degré est le carré d'un nombre premier by Peter Ludwig Mejdell Sylow, Volume 11, Page 201 - 256(Year 1887): A paper by Sylow on transitive group actions, that begins by stating the complete Sylow's theorem.Springerlink pageMore info