Zero-or-scalar lemma: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Statement== | ==Statement== | ||
Let <math>G</math> be a [[finite group]] and <math>\phi</math> a nontrivial [[linear representation]] of <math>G</math>. Let <math>g \in G</math>, such that the size of the [[conjugacy class]] of <math>G</math> is relatively prime to the [[degree]] of <math>\phi</math>. Then, either <math>\phi(g)</math> is a scalar or <math>\chi(g) = 0</math>. | Let <math>G</math> be a [[finite group]] and <math>\phi</math> a nontrivial [[fact about::irreducible linear representation]] of <math>G</math>. Let <math>g \in G</math>, such that the size of the [[conjugacy class]] of <math>G</math> is relatively prime to the [[degree]] of <math>\phi</math>. Then, either <math>\phi(g)</math> is a scalar or <math>\chi(g) = 0</math>. | ||
==Proof== | ==Proof== |
Revision as of 21:58, 22 February 2011
Statement
Let be a finite group and a nontrivial Irreducible linear representation (?) of . Let , such that the size of the conjugacy class of is relatively prime to the degree of . Then, either is a scalar or .
Proof
Let denote the conjugacy class of . We use the fact that the following is an algebraic integer:
Now, if and are relatively prime, then there exist integers and such that:
multiplying both sides by we get:
The left-hand-side is an algebraic integer, hence so is the right-hand-side. Thus is an algebraic integer.
We know that is a sum of roots of unity (not necessarily all distinct). Thus, every algebraic conjugate of is also a sum of roots of unity. In particular, this tells us that the norm of is either or .
Now if the norm is zero, then . If the norm is exactly 1, then all the roots of unity must be equal, and hence must be a scalar matrix.