Local powering-invariant subgroup containing the center is intermediately local powering-invariant in nilpotent group: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
(Created page with "==Statement== Suppose <math>G</math> is a nilpotent group and <math>H</math> is a subgroup containing the center of <math>G</math> that is also a local powering-inv...")
 
Line 33: Line 33:
| 5 || The element <math>x \in K</math>is the unique <math>p^{th}</math> root of <math>h</math> in all of <math>G</math>. || || <math>x \in K</matH> satisfies <math>x^p = h</math>. || Step (4) || given-step direct
| 5 || The element <math>x \in K</math>is the unique <math>p^{th}</math> root of <math>h</math> in all of <math>G</math>. || || <math>x \in K</matH> satisfies <math>x^p = h</math>. || Step (4) || given-step direct
|-
|-
| 7 || The element <math>x</math> of Step (5) is in <math>H</math>. || || <math>H</math> is local powering-invariant in <math>G</math>. || Step (6) || Step-given combination direct.
| 6 || The element <math>x</math> of Step (5) is in <math>H</math>. || || <math>H</math> is local powering-invariant in <math>G</math>. || Step (5) || Step-given combination direct.
|}
|}

Revision as of 19:57, 1 July 2013

Statement

Suppose G is a nilpotent group and H is a subgroup containing the center of G that is also a local powering-invariant subgroup of G. Then, H is an intermediately local powering-invariant subgroup of G. Explicitly, suppose K is a subgroup of G containing H. Then, H is a local powering-invariant subgroup of K.

Related facts

Facts used

  1. Torsion-freeness for a prime is subgroup-closed
  2. Equivalence of definitions of nilpotent group that is torsion-free for a set of primes

Proof

Given: A nilpotent group G, a subgroup H of G that is local powering-invariant and such that Z(G)≤H where Z(G) is the center of G. A subgroup K of G containing H. A prime number p and an element h∈H such that there is a unique element x∈K satisfying xp=h.

To prove: There exists a unique element x∈H such that xp=h.

Proof:

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 Z(G)≤K. Z(G)≤H,H≤K. given-direct
2 K is p-torsion-free. Fact (2) h∈K has a unique pth root in K. We use the equivalence (3) implies (1) within the multi-part equivalence of Fact (2).
3 Z(G) is p-torsion-free. Fact (1) Steps (1), (2) Step-fact combination direct
4 The map t↦tp is injective in G. Fact (2) G is nilpotent Step (3) Step-fact combination direct (specifically, we want to use the implication from (4) to (1) in the multi-part equivalence of Fact (2))
5 The element x∈Kis the unique pth root of h in all of G. x∈K satisfies xp=h. Step (4) given-step direct
6 The element x of Step (5) is in H. H is local powering-invariant in G. Step (5) Step-given combination direct.