Normal subgroup contained in the hypercenter satisfies the subgroup-to-quotient powering-invariance implication: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Statement==
==Statement==
===Original formulation===
Suppose <math>G</math> is a [[group]] and <math>H</math> is a [[normal subgroup contained in the hypercenter]] of <math>G</math>. Suppose <math>p</math> is a [[prime number]] such that <math>G</math> and <math>H</math> are both [[group powered over a set of primes|powered over]] the prime <math>p</math>. Then, the [[quotient group]] <math>G/H</math> is also powered over <math>p</math>.
===Corollary formulation===


Suppose <math>G</math> is a [[group]] and <math>H</math> is a [[normal subgroup contained in the hypercenter]] of <math>G</math> that is also a [[powering-invariant subgroup]] of <math>G</math>. Then, <math>H</math> is a [[quotient-powering-invariant subgroup]] of <math>G</math>.
Suppose <math>G</math> is a [[group]] and <math>H</math> is a [[normal subgroup contained in the hypercenter]] of <math>G</math> that is also a [[powering-invariant subgroup]] of <math>G</math>. Then, <math>H</math> is a [[quotient-powering-invariant subgroup]] of <math>G</math>.
Line 5: Line 11:
==Facts used==
==Facts used==


# [[uses::Powering-invariant and central implies quotient-powering-invariant]]
# Upper central series members are normal (in fact, they are [[strictly characteristic subgroup]]s)
# [[uses::Quotient-powering-invariance is quotient-transitive]]
# [[uses::Normality is strongly intersection-closed]]
# [[uses::Upper central series members are powering-invariant]]
# [[uses::Central implies normal satisfying the subgroup-to-quotient powering-invariance implication]]
# [[uses::Third isomorphism theorem]]
==Proof==
 
===Case of containment in a member of the finite upper central series===
 
'''Given''': A group <math>G</math> with upper central series <math>Z^0(G) \le Z^1(G) \le \dots</math>. A normal subgroup <math>H</math> of <math>G</math> contained in <math>Z^n(G)</math> for some positive integer <math>n</math>. A prime number <math>p</math> such that both <math>G</math> and <math>H</math> are powered over <math>p</math>.
 
'''To prove''': <math>G/H</math> is powered over <math>p</math>.
 
'''Proof''':
 
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Facts used !! Given data used !! Previous steps used !! Explanation
|-
| 1 || Consider the subgroup series <math>1 = H \cap Z^0(G) \le H \cap Z^1(G) \le H \cap Z^2(G) \le \dots \le H \cap Z^n(G) = H</math>. || || || ||
|-
| 2 || Each subgroup of the form <math>H \cap Z^i(G), 0 \le i \le n</math>, is a normal subgroup of <math>G</math>. || Facts (1), (2) || <math>H</math> is normal in <math>G</math>. || || Fact-given direct.
|-
| 3 || For any <math>i</math> with <math>0 \le i \le n - 1</math>, <math>(H \cap Z^{i+1}(G))/(H \cap Z^i(G))</math> is central in <math>G/(H \cap Z^i(G))</math>. || || || Step (2) (for making sense of quotients) || We have <math>[G,H \cap Z^{i+1}(G)] \le [G,H] \cap [G,Z^{i+1}(G)] \le H \cap Z^i(G)</math>, and the claim follows.
|-
| 4 || For any <math>i</math> with <math>0 \le i \le n - 1</math>, we have that if <math>G/(H \cap Z^i(G))</math> is <math>p</math>-powered and <math>(H \cap Z^{i+1}(G))/(H \cap Z^i(G))</math> is <math>p</math>-divisible (here, <math>p</math>-divisible means every element has a not necessarily unique <math>p^{th}</math> root in the group), then <math>G/(H \cap Z^{i+1}(G))</math> is <math>p</math>-powered. || Facts (4), (5) || || Step (3) || First note that if <math>G/(H \cap Z^i(G))</math> is <math>p</math>-powered, then any <math>p</math>-divisible subgroup must be <math>p</math>-powered because of global uniqueness of <math>p^{th}</math> roots. Thus, <math>(H \cap Z^{i+1}(G))/(H \cap Z^i(G))</math> is <math>p</math>-powered. Step (3) tells us that <math>(H \cap Z^{i+1}(G))/(H \cap Z^i(G))</math> is central in <math>G/(H \cap Z^i(G))</math>, hence by Fact (4) and the preceding sentences, we get that the quotient group <math>\frac{G/(H \cap Z^i(G))}{H \cap Z^{i+1}(G))/(H \cap Z^i(G))}</math> is <math>p</math>-powered. By Fact (5), this is isomorphic to <math>G/(H \cap Z^{i+1}(G))</math>, completing the proof.
|-
| 5 || Each of the subgroups <math>H \cap Z^i(G)</math> is <math>p</math>-powered and hence <math>p</amth>-divisible. || Fact (3) || <math>G</math> and <math>H</math> are both <math>p</math>-powered. || || By Fact (3), each <math>Z^i(G)</math> is <math>p</math>-powered. Combine with the fact that <math>H</math> is <math>p</math>-powered to get that the intersection is.
|-
| 6 || Each quotient group <math>(H \cap Z^{i+1}(G))/(H \cap Z^i(G))</math> is <math>p</math>-divisible for <math>0 \le i \le n - 1</math> (here, <math>p</math>-divisible means every element has a not necessarily unique <math>p^{th}</math> root in the group). || || || Step (5) || This follows directly from Step (5), and the observation that any any quotient of a <math>p</math>-divisible group by a normal subgroup is <math>p</math>-divisible.
|-
| 7 || For any <math>i</math> with <math>0 \le i \le n - 1</math>, we have that if <math>G/(H \cap Z^i(G))</math> is <math>p</math>-powered, so is <math>G/(H \cap Z^{i+1}(G))</math>. || || || Steps (4), (6) || Step-combination direct.
|-
| 8 || <math>G/H</math> is <math>p</math>-powered. || || <math>G</math> is <math>p</math>-powered. || Step (7) || Step (7) and use the principle of mathematical induction, starting from <math>i = 0</math> (i.e., <math>G</math> is <math>p</math>-powered), and inducting all the way till we reach that <math>G/(H \cap Z^n(G)) = G/H</math> is <math>p</math>-powered.
|}

Revision as of 03:15, 13 February 2013

Statement

Original formulation

Suppose is a group and is a normal subgroup contained in the hypercenter of . Suppose is a prime number such that and are both powered over the prime . Then, the quotient group is also powered over .

Corollary formulation

Suppose is a group and is a normal subgroup contained in the hypercenter of that is also a powering-invariant subgroup of . Then, is a quotient-powering-invariant subgroup of .

Facts used

  1. Upper central series members are normal (in fact, they are strictly characteristic subgroups)
  2. Normality is strongly intersection-closed
  3. Upper central series members are powering-invariant
  4. Central implies normal satisfying the subgroup-to-quotient powering-invariance implication
  5. Third isomorphism theorem

Proof

Case of containment in a member of the finite upper central series

Given: A group with upper central series . A normal subgroup of contained in for some positive integer . A prime number such that both and are powered over .

To prove: is powered over .

Proof:

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 Consider the subgroup series .
2 Each subgroup of the form , is a normal subgroup of . Facts (1), (2) is normal in . Fact-given direct.
3 For any with , is central in . Step (2) (for making sense of quotients) We have , and the claim follows.
4 For any with , we have that if is -powered and is -divisible (here, -divisible means every element has a not necessarily unique root in the group), then is -powered. Facts (4), (5) Step (3) First note that if is -powered, then any -divisible subgroup must be -powered because of global uniqueness of roots. Thus, is -powered. Step (3) tells us that is central in , hence by Fact (4) and the preceding sentences, we get that the quotient group is -powered. By Fact (5), this is isomorphic to , completing the proof.
5 Each of the subgroups is -powered and hence and are both -powered. By Fact (3), each is -powered. Combine with the fact that is -powered to get that the intersection is.
6 Each quotient group is -divisible for (here, -divisible means every element has a not necessarily unique root in the group). Step (5) This follows directly from Step (5), and the observation that any any quotient of a -divisible group by a normal subgroup is -divisible.
7 For any with , we have that if is -powered, so is . Steps (4), (6) Step-combination direct.
8 is -powered. is -powered. Step (7) Step (7) and use the principle of mathematical induction, starting from (i.e., is -powered), and inducting all the way till we reach that is -powered.