Homomorphism commutes with word maps: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
(Created page with "==Statement== Suppose <math>w</math> is a word in the letters <math>x_1,x_2,\dots,x_n</math> (these ...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 7: Line 7:
where the <math>w</math> on the left is the [[word map]] in <math>G</math> (i.e., it evaluates the word for a tuple of values of the letters in <math>G</math> and the <math>w</math> on the right is the word map in <math>H</math>.
where the <math>w</math> on the left is the [[word map]] in <math>G</math> (i.e., it evaluates the word for a tuple of values of the letters in <math>G</math> and the <math>w</math> on the right is the word map in <math>H</math>.


==Related facts==
===Applications===
* [[Verbal implies fully invariant]]
==Proof==
==Proof==


A formal proof can be given by inducting on the length of the word. {{fillin}}
A formal proof can be given by inducting on the length of the word. {{fillin}}

Latest revision as of 16:50, 22 June 2012

Statement

Suppose w is a word in the letters x1,x2,,xn (these are just formal symbols). Suppose φ:GH is a homomorphism of groups. Then, φ commutes with w, i.e.:

φ(w(g1,g2,,gn))=w(φ(g1),φ(g2),,φ(gn))g1,g2,,gnG

where the w on the left is the word map in G (i.e., it evaluates the word for a tuple of values of the letters in G and the w on the right is the word map in H.

Related facts

Applications

Proof

A formal proof can be given by inducting on the length of the word. PLACEHOLDER FOR INFORMATION TO BE FILLED IN: [SHOW MORE]