Sufficiency of subgroup criterion: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
Line 15: Line 15:
We shall here prove the equivalence of the first two conditions. Equivalence of the first and third conditions follows by analogous reasoning.
We shall here prove the equivalence of the first two conditions. Equivalence of the first and third conditions follows by analogous reasoning.


===First implies second===
===(1) implies (2)===


Clearly, if <math>H</math> is a subgroup:
Clearly, if <math>H</math> is a subgroup:
Line 22: Line 22:
* Whenever <math>a, b</math> are in <math>H</math> so is <math>b^{-1}</math> and hence <math>b^{-1}a</math>
* Whenever <math>a, b</math> are in <math>H</math> so is <math>b^{-1}</math> and hence <math>b^{-1}a</math>


===Second implies first===
===(2) implies (1)===


Suppose <math>H</math> is a nonempty subset closed under left quotient of elements. Then, pick an element <math>a</math> from <math>H</math>.  
Suppose <math>H</math> is a nonempty subset closed under left quotient of elements. Then, pick an element <math>a</math> from <math>H</math>.  

Revision as of 21:20, 27 September 2008

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in group theory.
View a complete list of basic facts in group theory
VIEW FACTS USING THIS: directly | directly or indirectly, upto two steps | directly or indirectly, upto three steps|
VIEW: Survey articles about this

This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term subgroup
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions

Statement

For a subset of a group , the following are equivalent:

  1. is a subgroup, viz is closed under the binary operation of multiplication, the inverse map, and contains the identity element
  2. is a nonempty set closed under left quotient of elements (that is, for any in , is also in )
  3. is a nonempty set closed under right quotient of elements (that is, for any in , is also in )

Proof

We shall here prove the equivalence of the first two conditions. Equivalence of the first and third conditions follows by analogous reasoning.

(1) implies (2)

Clearly, if is a subgroup:

  • is nonempty since contains the identity element
  • Whenever are in so is and hence

(2) implies (1)

Suppose is a nonempty subset closed under left quotient of elements. Then, pick an element from .

  • is contained in , hence is in
  • Now that is in , is also in , so is in
  • Suppose are in . Then, is also in . Hence, is in , which tells us that is in .

Thus, satisfies all the three conditions to be a subgroup.