Sufficiency of subgroup criterion: Difference between revisions
(→Proof) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
We shall here prove the equivalence of the first two conditions. Equivalence of the first and third conditions follows by analogous reasoning. | We shall here prove the equivalence of the first two conditions. Equivalence of the first and third conditions follows by analogous reasoning. | ||
=== | ===(1) implies (2)=== | ||
Clearly, if <math>H</math> is a subgroup: | Clearly, if <math>H</math> is a subgroup: | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
* Whenever <math>a, b</math> are in <math>H</math> so is <math>b^{-1}</math> and hence <math>b^{-1}a</math> | * Whenever <math>a, b</math> are in <math>H</math> so is <math>b^{-1}</math> and hence <math>b^{-1}a</math> | ||
=== | ===(2) implies (1)=== | ||
Suppose <math>H</math> is a nonempty subset closed under left quotient of elements. Then, pick an element <math>a</math> from <math>H</math>. | Suppose <math>H</math> is a nonempty subset closed under left quotient of elements. Then, pick an element <math>a</math> from <math>H</math>. | ||
Revision as of 21:20, 27 September 2008
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in group theory.
View a complete list of basic facts in group theory
VIEW FACTS USING THIS: directly | directly or indirectly, upto two steps | directly or indirectly, upto three steps|
VIEW: Survey articles about this
This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term subgroup
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions
Statement
For a subset of a group , the following are equivalent:
- is a subgroup, viz is closed under the binary operation of multiplication, the inverse map, and contains the identity element
- is a nonempty set closed under left quotient of elements (that is, for any in , is also in )
- is a nonempty set closed under right quotient of elements (that is, for any in , is also in )
Proof
We shall here prove the equivalence of the first two conditions. Equivalence of the first and third conditions follows by analogous reasoning.
(1) implies (2)
Clearly, if is a subgroup:
- is nonempty since contains the identity element
- Whenever are in so is and hence
(2) implies (1)
Suppose is a nonempty subset closed under left quotient of elements. Then, pick an element from .
- is contained in , hence is in
- Now that is in , is also in , so is in
- Suppose are in . Then, is also in . Hence, is in , which tells us that is in .
Thus, satisfies all the three conditions to be a subgroup.