Tour:Invertible implies cancellative in monoid: Difference between revisions
(New page: {{quotation|In a monoid (set with associative binary operation and neutral element) any invertible element can be canceled from an equation. In particular, in groups, ''any'' element i...) |
m (Vipul moved page Tour:Invertible implies cancellative to Tour:Invertible implies cancellative in monoid) |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{quotation| | {{derivative of|invertible implies cancellative in monoid}} | ||
{{tour-regular| | |||
target = beginners| | |||
secnum = two| | |||
previous = Equivalence of definitions of group| | |||
next = Equivalence of definitions of subgroup| | |||
expected time = 5 minutes}} | |||
{{quotation|'''WHAT YOU NEED TO DO''': | |||
* Understand the statement below; try proving it yourself | |||
* Understand the proof, and the crucial way in which it relies on associativity | |||
'''PONDER''': | |||
* What happens if we remove the assumption of associativity? Can you cook up a magma (set with binary operation) having a neutral element, where an element has a left inverse but is not cancellative?}} | |||
{{#lst:Invertible implies cancellative in monoid|main}} | |||
{{tour-regular-bottom| | |||
target = beginners| | |||
secnum = two| | |||
previous = Equivalence of definitions of group| | |||
next = Equivalence of definitions of subgroup}} | |||
= | |||
Latest revision as of 08:44, 4 April 2013
This article adapts material from the main article: invertible implies cancellative in monoid
This page is part of the Groupprops guided tour for beginners (Jump to beginning of tour)
PREVIOUS: Equivalence of definitions of group| UP: Introduction two (beginners)| NEXT: Equivalence of definitions of subgroup
Expected time for this page: 5 minutes
General instructions for the tour | Pedagogical notes for the tour | Pedagogical notes for this part
WHAT YOU NEED TO DO:
- Understand the statement below; try proving it yourself
- Understand the proof, and the crucial way in which it relies on associativity
PONDER:
- What happens if we remove the assumption of associativity? Can you cook up a magma (set with binary operation) having a neutral element, where an element has a left inverse but is not cancellative?
Statement
In a monoid (a set with an associative binary operation possessing a multiplicative identity element) the following are true:
- Any left invertible element (element having a left inverse) is left cancellative.
- Any right invertible element (element having a right inverse) is right cancellative.
- Any invertible element is cancellative.
Proof
We'll give here the proof for left invertible and left cancellative. An analogous proof works for right invertible and right cancellative.
Given: A monoid with binary operation , and identity element (also called neutral element) . has a left inverse (i.e. an element )
To prove: is left-cancellative: whenever are such that , then .
Proof: We start with:
Left-multiply both sides by :
Use associativity:
We now use that is the identity element, to conclude that .
This page is part of the Groupprops guided tour for beginners. Make notes of any doubts, confusions or comments you have about this page before proceeding.
PREVIOUS: Equivalence of definitions of group| UP: Introduction two (beginners)| NEXT: Equivalence of definitions of subgroup