Universal quadratic functor: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 10: Line 10:


* The mapping <math>x \mapsto \gamma(x)</math> is homogeneous of degree two: <math>\gamma(nx) = n^2 \gamma(x)</math> for all <math>n \in \mathbb{Z}</math>
* The mapping <math>x \mapsto \gamma(x)</math> is homogeneous of degree two: <math>\gamma(nx) = n^2 \gamma(x)</math> for all <math>n \in \mathbb{Z}</math>
* The mapping <math>(x,y) \mapsto \gamma(x + y) - \gamma(x) - \gamma(y)</math> is a [[bihomomorphism]], i.e., it is additive in each coordiate.
* The mapping <math>(x,y) \mapsto \gamma(x + y) - \gamma(x) - \gamma(y)</math> is a [[bihomomorphism]], i.e., it is additive in each coordinate.


===Equivalence of definitions===
{{further|[[equivalence of definitions of universal quadratic functor]]}}
==Facts==
==Facts==



Latest revision as of 23:14, 13 June 2012

Definition

The universal quadratic functor (sometimes called Whitehead's universal quadratic functor) is a functor from abelian groups to abelian groups defined as follow. For an abelian group it outputs a group given as the quotient of a free group on all the symbols by the following types of relations:

  • (this condition is redundant)
  • .

Note that the above set of relations is equivalent to the following pair of assumptions:

  • The mapping is homogeneous of degree two: for all
  • The mapping is a bihomomorphism, i.e., it is additive in each coordinate.

Equivalence of definitions

Further information: equivalence of definitions of universal quadratic functor

Facts

  • The exponent of in divides twice the exponent of in . This follows from noting that the bilinear form also satisfies so , and the exponent of divides the exponent of due to biadditivity.
  • Formula for universal quadratic functor of direct product

Particular cases

Starting group Universal quadratic functor Comments
finite cyclic group of odd order , i.e., Intuitively, this is saying that if is defined mod for odd, then is defined mod but we cannot do better in general
finite cyclic group of even order , i.e., Intuitively, this is saying that if is defined mod for even, then is defined mod but we cannot do better in general
group of integers we can think of the generator for as the squaring map in the ring of integers