Exponent three implies 2-Engel for groups: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
(Created page with "==Statement== Any group of exponent equal to three must be a 2-Engel group. ==Related facts== ===Not true for Lie rings=== * [[Exponent three n...")
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Statement==
==Statement==


Any group of [[exponent of a group|exponent]] equal to three must be a [[2-Engel group]].
Any group of [[exponent of a group|exponent]] equal to three must be a [[fact about::2-Engel group;1| ]][[proves property satisfaction of::2-Engel group]] (also known as a Levi group).


==Related facts==
==Related facts==
Line 8: Line 8:


* [[Exponent three not implies 2-Engel for Lie rings]]
* [[Exponent three not implies 2-Engel for Lie rings]]
===Converse of sorts===
This converse says that although a 2-Engel group need not have exponent three, the extent to which 2-Engel ''differs'' from class two is captured by exponent three:
* [[2-Engel group implies third member of lower central series has exponent dividing three]]
* [[2-Engel Lie ring implies third member of lower central series is in 3-torsion]]
===Applications===
* [[Exponent three implies class three for groups]]
==Proof==
We use the definition that a group is a 2-Engel group if and only if an two conjugates commute.
===Proof using left action convention===
In this convention, the conjugate of <math>a</math> by <math>b</math> is denoted <math>bab^{-1}</math> and the commutator <math>[a,b]</math> is defined as <math>aba^{-1}b^{-1}</math>.
'''Given''': A group <math>G</math> of exponent three, elements <math>x,y \in G</math>
'''To prove''': <math>[x,yxy^{-1}]</math> is the identity element.
'''Proof''': We have:
<math>[x,yxy^{-1}] = xyxy^{-1}x^{-1}(yxy^{-1})^{-1}</math>
This simplifies to:
<math>xyxy^{-1}x^{-1}yx^{-1}y^{-1}</math>
Rewrite the right most <math>y^{-1}</math> as <math>y^2 = yy</math>, using that <math>y^3</math> is the identity element, and get:
<math>xyxy^{-1}x^{-1}yx^{-1}yy</math>
We now see two adjacent occurrences of <math>x^{-1}y</math>, so we have a <math>(x^{-1}y)^2</math> in the expression. Using that <math>(x^{-1}y)^3</math> is the identity element, we obtain that <math>(x^{-1}y)^2 = (x^{-1}y)^{-1} = y^{-1}x</math>. We get:
<math>xyxy^{-1}(y^{-1}x)y</math>
We now see two adjacent occurrences of <math>y^{-1}</math>, giving <math>y^{-2}</math>, which simplifies to <math>y</math>, again using that <math>y^3</math> is the identity element. We get:
<math>xyxyxy</math>
We now simplify this to the identity element using that <math>(xy)^3</math> is the identity element, and we are done.

Latest revision as of 06:30, 20 May 2012

Statement

Any group of exponent equal to three must be a 2-Engel group (also known as a Levi group).

Related facts

Not true for Lie rings

Converse of sorts

This converse says that although a 2-Engel group need not have exponent three, the extent to which 2-Engel differs from class two is captured by exponent three:

Applications

Proof

We use the definition that a group is a 2-Engel group if and only if an two conjugates commute.

Proof using left action convention

In this convention, the conjugate of a by b is denoted bab1 and the commutator [a,b] is defined as aba1b1.

Given: A group G of exponent three, elements x,yG

To prove: [x,yxy1] is the identity element.

Proof: We have:

[x,yxy1]=xyxy1x1(yxy1)1

This simplifies to:

xyxy1x1yx1y1

Rewrite the right most y1 as y2=yy, using that y3 is the identity element, and get:

xyxy1x1yx1yy

We now see two adjacent occurrences of x1y, so we have a (x1y)2 in the expression. Using that (x1y)3 is the identity element, we obtain that (x1y)2=(x1y)1=y1x. We get:

xyxy1(y1x)y

We now see two adjacent occurrences of y1, giving y2, which simplifies to y, again using that y3 is the identity element. We get:

xyxyxy

We now simplify this to the identity element using that (xy)3 is the identity element, and we are done.