Commensurator of subgroup is subgroup: Difference between revisions
(→Proof) |
|||
| (13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Page class::Fact| ]][[Difficulty level::3| ]] | |||
==Statement== | ==Statement== | ||
Suppose <math>H</math> is a [[subgroup]] of a [[group]] <math>G</math>. Consider the [[fact about::commensurator of a subgroup|commensurator]] <math>K</math> of <math>H</math> in <math>G</math>, defined as the set of all <math>g \in G</math> such that <math>H \cap gHg^{-1}</math> is a [[subgroup of finite index]] in both <math>H</math> and <math>gHg^{-1}</math>, i.e., <math>H</math> and <math>gHg^{-1}</math> are [[fact about::commensurable subgroups]]. Then, <math>K</math> is a subgroup of <math>G</math>. | Suppose <math>H</math> is a [[subgroup]] of a [[group]] <math>G</math>. Consider the [[fact about::commensurator of a subgroup|commensurator]] <math>K</math> of <math>H</math> in <math>G</math>, defined as the set of all <math>g \in G</math> such that <math>H \cap gHg^{-1}</math> is a [[subgroup of finite index]] in both <math>H</math> and <math>gHg^{-1}</math>, i.e., <math>H</math> and <math>gHg^{-1}</math> are [[fact about::commensurable subgroups;2| ]][[commensurable subgroups]]. Then, <math>K</math> is a subgroup of <math>G</math>. | ||
==Facts used== | |||
# [[uses::Group acts as automorphisms by conjugation]] | |||
# [[uses::Index satisfies transfer inequality]] | |||
# [[uses::Index is multiplicative]] | |||
==Proof== | ==Proof== | ||
{{tabular proof format}} | |||
'''Given''': A group <math>G</math>, a subgroup <math>H</math> of <math>G</math>. <math>K</math> is the set of all <math>g \in G</math> such that <math>H \cap gHg^{-1}</math> has finite index in both <math>H</math> and <math>gHg^{-1}</math>. | '''Given''': A group <math>G</math>, a subgroup <math>H</math> of <math>G</math>. <math>K</math> is the set of all <math>g \in G</math> such that <math>H \cap gHg^{-1}</math> has finite index in both <math>H</math> and <math>gHg^{-1}</math>. | ||
'''To prove''': <math>K</math> is a subgroup of <math>G</math>. | '''To prove''': <math>K</math> is a subgroup of <math>G</math>. | ||
'''Proof''': | |||
===Proof for identity element=== | |||
Let <math>e</math> denote the identity element of <math>G</math>. We have <math>eHe^{-1} = H</math>, so the intersection <math>H \cap eHe^{-1}</math> also equals <math>H</math>. This has index <math>1</math> in both <math>H</math> and <math>eHe^{-1}</math>, which is finite. | |||
===Proof for inverses=== | |||
'''Additional given''': <math>g \in K</math>. In other words, <math>H \cap gHg^{-1}</math> has finite index in both <math>H</math> and <math>gHg^{-1}</math>. | |||
'''To prove''': <math>g^{-1} \in K</math>, i.e., <math>H \cap g^{-1}Hg</math> has finite index in both <math>H</math> and <math>g^{-1}Hg</math>. | |||
'''Proof''' | |||
{| class="sortable" border="1" | |||
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Facts used !! Given data used !! Previous steps used !! Explanation | |||
|- | |||
| 1 || Consider the map <math>\sigma:G \to G</math> given by <math>\sigma(x) := g^{-1}xg</math>. This is an inner automorphism of <math>G</math> || Fact (1) || -- || -- || | |||
|- | |||
| 2 || <math>\sigma</math> preserves intersections and index of subgroups || Follows from definition of automorphism || || Step (1) || | |||
|- | |||
| 3 || <math>\sigma(H) = g^{-1}Hg</math> and <math>\sigma(gHg^{-1}) = H</math>. || || || Step (1) || | |||
|- | |||
| 4 || <math>\sigma(H \cap gHg^{-1}) = g^{-1}Hg \cap H</math>. || || || Steps (2), (3) || | |||
|- | |||
| 5 || <math>H \cap gHg^{-1}</math> has finite index in both <math>H</math> and <math>gHg^{-1}</math>. || || <math>g \in K</math>, the commensurator of <math>H</math>. || || | |||
|- | |||
| 6 || <math>\sigma(H \cap gHg^{-1}) = g^{-1}Hg \cap H</math> has finite index in both <math>\! \sigma(H) = g^{-1}Hg</math> and <math>\! \sigma(gHg^{-1}) = H</math>. || || || Steps (2), (3), (4), (5) || <toggledisplay>We apply <math>\sigma</math> to the statement of Step (5), which is permissible because automorphisms preserve index of subgroups. We use Steps (3) and (4) to compute what the images of the three subgroups under <math>\sigma</math>.</toggledisplay> | |||
|- | |||
| 7 || <math>g^{-1}</math> is in <math>K</math>. || || definition of <math>K</math> || Step (6) || Step-definition direct. | |||
|} | |||
===Proof for products=== | |||
'''Additional given''': <math>g_1, g_2 \in K</math> | |||
'''To prove''': <math>g_1g_2 \in K</math>, i.e., <math>H \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> has finite index in both <math>H</math> and in <math>(g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>. | |||
'''Proof''': | '''Proof''': | ||
{| class="sortable" border="1" | {| class="sortable" border="1" | ||
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Explanation | ! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Facts used !! Given data used !! Previous steps used !! Explanation | ||
|- | |||
| 1 || Consider the map <math>\tau:G \to G</math> given by <math>\tau(x) = g_1xg_1^{-1}</math>. Then, <matH>\tau</math> is an inner automorphism and in particular an automorphism of <math>G</math>. || Fact (1) || || || | |||
|- | |||
| 2 || <math>\tau</math> preserves intersections and index of subgroups || follows from definition of automorphism || || Step (1) || | |||
|- | |||
| 3 || <math>\tau(H) = g_1Hg_1^{-1}</math> and <math>\tau(g_2Hg_2^{-1}) = g_1g_2Hg_2^{-1}g_1^{-1} = (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>. || || || Step (1) || | |||
|- | |||
| 4 || <math>\tau(H \cap g_2Hg_2^{-1}) = g_1Hg_1^{-1} \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>. || || || Steps (2), (3) || | |||
|- | |||
| 5 || <math>H \cap g_2Hg_2^{-1}</math> has finite index in both <math>\! H</math> and <math>\! g_2Hg_2^{-1}</math>. || || <math>g_2 \in K</math>, definition of <math>K</math> || || Given-direct | |||
|- | |||
| 6 || <math>g_1Hg_1^{-1} \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> has finite index in (i) <math>\! g_1Hg_1^{-1}</math> and (ii) <math>\! (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>. || || || Steps (2), (3), (4), (5) || <toggledisplay>We apply <math>\tau</math> to both sides of Step (5), permissible by Step (2), and then simplify using Steps (3) and (4).</toggledisplay> | |||
|- | |||
| 7 || <math>H \cap (g_1Hg_1^{-1} \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1})</math> has finite index in (i) <math>H \cap g_1Hg_1^{-1}</math> and (ii) <math>H \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>. || Fact (2) || || Step (6) || <toggledisplay>Intersect all terms of Step (6) with <math>H</math> and apply Fact (2).</toggledisplay> | |||
|- | |||
| 8 || <math>H \cap g_1Hg_1^{-1}</math> has finite index in (i) <math>\!H</math> and in (ii) <math>g_1Hg_1^{-1}</math> || || <math>g_1 \in K</math>, definition of <math>K</math> || || Given-direct | |||
|- | |||
| 9 || <math>H \cap (g_1Hg_1^{-1} \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1})</math> has finite index in <math>\! H</math>. || Fact (3) || || Steps (7)(i), (8)(i) || <toggledisplay>Combine Steps (7)(i) and (8)(i) with Fact (3) for the chain <math>H \cap (g_1Hg_1^{-1} \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}) \le H \cap g_1Hg_1^{-1} \le H</math></toggledisplay> | |||
|- | |||
| 10 || <math>H \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> has finite index in <math>\! H</math> || Fact (3) || || Step (9) || <toggledisplay>Follows from Step (9), when we note that <math>H \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> is an intermediate subgroup between <math>H \cap (g_1Hg_1^{-1} \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1})</math> and <math>H</math>.</toggledisplay> | |||
|- | |||
| 11 || <math>(H \cap g_1Hg_1^{-1}) \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> has finite index in (i) <math>H \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> and (ii) <math>g_1Hg_1^{-1} \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> || Fact (2) || || Step (8) || <toggledisplay>Intersect all terms of Step (8) with <math>(g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>.</toggledisplay> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | 12 || <math>(H \cap g_1Hg_1^{-1}) \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> has finite index in <math>\! (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> || Fact (3) || || Steps (6)(ii), (11)(ii) || <toggledisplay>Combine Steps (11)(ii) and (6)(ii) with Fact (4) for the chain <math>(H \cap g_1Hg_1^{-1}) \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1} \le g_1Hg_1^{-1} \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1} \le (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>.</toggledisplay> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | 13 || <math>H \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> has finite index in <math>\! (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> || Fact (3) || || Step (12) || <toggledisplay>Follows from Step (12), when we note that <math>H \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> is an intermediate subgroup between <math>(H \cap g_1Hg_1^{-1}) \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> and <math>(g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>.</toggledisplay> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | 14 || <math>g_1g_2 \in K</math>, i.e., <math>H \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> has finite index in both <math>H</math> and <math>\! (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>. || || || Steps (10), (13) || Step-combination direct. | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:28, 29 April 2022
Statement
Suppose is a subgroup of a group . Consider the commensurator of in , defined as the set of all such that is a subgroup of finite index in both and , i.e., and are commensurable subgroups. Then, is a subgroup of .
Facts used
- Group acts as automorphisms by conjugation
- Index satisfies transfer inequality
- Index is multiplicative
Proof
This proof uses a tabular format for presentation. Provide feedback on tabular proof formats in a survey (opens in new window/tab) | Learn more about tabular proof formats|View all pages on facts with proofs in tabular format
Given: A group , a subgroup of . is the set of all such that has finite index in both and .
To prove: is a subgroup of .
Proof:
Proof for identity element
Let denote the identity element of . We have , so the intersection also equals . This has index in both and , which is finite.
Proof for inverses
Additional given: . In other words, has finite index in both and .
To prove: , i.e., has finite index in both and .
Proof
| Step no. | Assertion/construction | Facts used | Given data used | Previous steps used | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Consider the map given by . This is an inner automorphism of | Fact (1) | -- | -- | |
| 2 | preserves intersections and index of subgroups | Follows from definition of automorphism | Step (1) | ||
| 3 | and . | Step (1) | |||
| 4 | . | Steps (2), (3) | |||
| 5 | has finite index in both and . | , the commensurator of . | |||
| 6 | has finite index in both and . | Steps (2), (3), (4), (5) | [SHOW MORE] | ||
| 7 | is in . | definition of | Step (6) | Step-definition direct. |
Proof for products
Additional given:
To prove: , i.e., has finite index in both and in .
Proof:
| Step no. | Assertion/construction | Facts used | Given data used | Previous steps used | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Consider the map given by . Then, is an inner automorphism and in particular an automorphism of . | Fact (1) | |||
| 2 | preserves intersections and index of subgroups | follows from definition of automorphism | Step (1) | ||
| 3 | and . | Step (1) | |||
| 4 | . | Steps (2), (3) | |||
| 5 | has finite index in both and . | , definition of | Given-direct | ||
| 6 | has finite index in (i) and (ii) . | Steps (2), (3), (4), (5) | [SHOW MORE] | ||
| 7 | has finite index in (i) and (ii) . | Fact (2) | Step (6) | [SHOW MORE] | |
| 8 | has finite index in (i) and in (ii) | , definition of | Given-direct | ||
| 9 | has finite index in . | Fact (3) | Steps (7)(i), (8)(i) | [SHOW MORE] | |
| 10 | has finite index in | Fact (3) | Step (9) | [SHOW MORE] | |
| 11 | has finite index in (i) and (ii) | Fact (2) | Step (8) | [SHOW MORE] | |
| 12 | has finite index in | Fact (3) | Steps (6)(ii), (11)(ii) | [SHOW MORE] | |
| 13 | has finite index in | Fact (3) | Step (12) | [SHOW MORE] | |
| 14 | , i.e., has finite index in both and . | Steps (10), (13) | Step-combination direct. |