Commensurator of subgroup is subgroup: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Page class::Fact| ]][[Difficulty level::3| ]]
==Statement==
==Statement==


Suppose <math>H</math> is a [[subgroup]] of a [[group]] <math>G</math>. Consider the [[fact about::commensurator of a subgroup|commensurator]] <math>K</math> of <math>H</math> in <math>G</math>, defined as the set of all <math>g \in G</math> such that <math>H \cap gHg^{-1}</math> is a [[subgroup of finite index]] in both <math>H</math> and <math>gHg^{-1}</math>, i.e., <math>H</math> and <math>gHg^{-1}</math> are [[fact about::commensurable subgroups]]. Then, <math>K</math> is a subgroup of <math>G</math>.
Suppose <math>H</math> is a [[subgroup]] of a [[group]] <math>G</math>. Consider the [[fact about::commensurator of a subgroup|commensurator]] <math>K</math> of <math>H</math> in <math>G</math>, defined as the set of all <math>g \in G</math> such that <math>H \cap gHg^{-1}</math> is a [[subgroup of finite index]] in both <math>H</math> and <math>gHg^{-1}</math>, i.e., <math>H</math> and <math>gHg^{-1}</math> are [[fact about::commensurable subgroups;2| ]][[commensurable subgroups]]. Then, <math>K</math> is a subgroup of <math>G</math>.
 
==Facts used==
 
# [[uses::Group acts as automorphisms by conjugation]]
# [[uses::Index satisfies transfer inequality]]
# [[uses::Index is multiplicative]]


==Proof==
==Proof==
{{tabular proof format}}


'''Given''': A group <math>G</math>, a subgroup <math>H</math> of <math>G</math>. <math>K</math> is the set of all <math>g \in G</math> such that <math>H \cap gHg^{-1}</math> has finite index in both <math>H</math> and <math>gHg^{-1}</math>.
'''Given''': A group <math>G</math>, a subgroup <math>H</math> of <math>G</math>. <math>K</math> is the set of all <math>g \in G</math> such that <math>H \cap gHg^{-1}</math> has finite index in both <math>H</math> and <math>gHg^{-1}</math>.


'''To prove''': <math>K</math> is a subgroup of <math>G</math>.
'''To prove''': <math>K</math> is a subgroup of <math>G</math>.
'''Proof''':
===Proof for identity element===
Let <math>e</math> denote the identity element of <math>G</math>. We have <math>eHe^{-1} = H</math>, so the intersection <math>H \cap eHe^{-1}</math> also equals <math>H</math>. This has index <math>1</math> in both <math>H</math> and <math>eHe^{-1}</math>, which is finite.
===Proof for inverses===
'''Additional given''': <math>g \in K</math>. In other words, <math>H \cap gHg^{-1}</math> has finite index in both <math>H</math> and <math>gHg^{-1}</math>.
'''To prove''': <math>g^{-1} \in K</math>, i.e., <math>H \cap g^{-1}Hg</math> has finite index in both <math>H</math> and <math>g^{-1}Hg</math>.
'''Proof'''
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Facts used !! Given data used !! Previous steps used !! Explanation
|-
| 1 || Consider the map <math>\sigma:G \to G</math> given by <math>\sigma(x) := g^{-1}xg</math>. This is an inner automorphism of <math>G</math> || Fact (1) || -- || -- ||
|-
| 2 || <math>\sigma</math> preserves intersections and index of subgroups || Follows from definition of automorphism || || Step (1) ||
|-
| 3 || <math>\sigma(H) = g^{-1}Hg</math> and <math>\sigma(gHg^{-1}) = H</math>. || || || Step (1) ||
|-
| 4 || <math>\sigma(H \cap gHg^{-1}) = g^{-1}Hg \cap H</math>. || || || Steps (2), (3) ||
|-
| 5 || <math>H \cap gHg^{-1}</math> has finite index in both <math>H</math> and <math>gHg^{-1}</math>. || || <math>g \in K</math>, the commensurator of <math>H</math>. || ||
|-
| 6 || <math>\sigma(H \cap gHg^{-1}) = g^{-1}Hg \cap H</math> has finite index in both <math>\! \sigma(H) = g^{-1}Hg</math> and <math>\! \sigma(gHg^{-1}) = H</math>. || || || Steps (2), (3), (4), (5) || <toggledisplay>We apply <math>\sigma</math> to the statement of Step (5), which is permissible because automorphisms preserve index of subgroups. We use Steps (3) and (4) to compute what the images of the three subgroups under <math>\sigma</math>.</toggledisplay>
|-
| 7 || <math>g^{-1}</math> is in <math>K</math>. || || definition of <math>K</math> || Step (6) || Step-definition direct.
|}
===Proof for products===
'''Additional given''': <math>g_1, g_2 \in K</math>
'''To prove''': <math>g_1g_2 \in K</math>, i.e., <math>H \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> has finite index in both <math>H</math> and in <math>(g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>.


'''Proof''':
'''Proof''':


{| class="sortable" border="1"
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Explanation
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Facts used !! Given data used !! Previous steps used !! Explanation
|-
| 1 || Consider the map <math>\tau:G \to G</math> given by <math>\tau(x) = g_1xg_1^{-1}</math>. Then, <matH>\tau</math> is an inner automorphism and in particular an automorphism of <math>G</math>. || Fact (1) || || ||
|-
| 2 || <math>\tau</math> preserves intersections and index of subgroups || follows from definition of automorphism || || Step (1) ||
|-
| 3 || <math>\tau(H) = g_1Hg_1^{-1}</math> and <math>\tau(g_2Hg_2^{-1}) = g_1g_2Hg_2^{-1}g_1^{-1} = (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>. || || || Step (1) ||
|-
| 4 || <math>\tau(H \cap g_2Hg_2^{-1}) = g_1Hg_1^{-1} \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>. || || || Steps (2), (3) ||
|-
| 5 ||  <math>H \cap g_2Hg_2^{-1}</math> has finite index in both <math>\! H</math> and <math>\! g_2Hg_2^{-1}</math>. || || <math>g_2 \in K</math>, definition of <math>K</math> || || Given-direct
|-
| 6 || <math>g_1Hg_1^{-1} \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> has finite index in (i) <math>\! g_1Hg_1^{-1}</math> and (ii) <math>\! (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>. || || || Steps (2), (3), (4), (5) || <toggledisplay>We apply <math>\tau</math> to both sides of Step (5), permissible by Step (2), and then simplify using Steps (3) and (4).</toggledisplay>
|-
| 7 || <math>H \cap (g_1Hg_1^{-1} \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1})</math> has finite index in (i) <math>H \cap g_1Hg_1^{-1}</math> and (ii) <math>H \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>. || Fact (2) || || Step (6) || <toggledisplay>Intersect all terms of Step (6) with <math>H</math> and apply Fact (2).</toggledisplay>
|-
| 8 || <math>H \cap g_1Hg_1^{-1}</math> has finite index in (i) <math>\!H</math> and in (ii) <math>g_1Hg_1^{-1}</math> || || <math>g_1 \in K</math>, definition of <math>K</math> || || Given-direct
|-
| 9 || <math>H \cap (g_1Hg_1^{-1} \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1})</math> has finite index in <math>\! H</math>. || Fact (3) || || Steps (7)(i), (8)(i) || <toggledisplay>Combine Steps (7)(i) and (8)(i) with Fact (3) for the chain <math>H \cap (g_1Hg_1^{-1} \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}) \le H \cap g_1Hg_1^{-1} \le H</math></toggledisplay>
|-
| 10 || <math>H \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> has finite index in <math>\! H</math> || Fact (3) || || Step (9) || <toggledisplay>Follows from Step (9), when we note that <math>H \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> is an intermediate subgroup between <math>H \cap (g_1Hg_1^{-1} \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1})</math> and <math>H</math>.</toggledisplay>
|-
| 11 || <math>(H \cap g_1Hg_1^{-1}) \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> has finite index in (i) <math>H \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> and (ii) <math>g_1Hg_1^{-1} \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> || Fact (2) || || Step (8) || <toggledisplay>Intersect all terms of Step (8) with <math>(g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>.</toggledisplay>
|-
|-
| 1 || The identity element <math>e</math> of <math>G</math> is in <math>K</math> || <toggledisplay><math>eHe^{-1} = H</math>, so the intersection <math>H \cap eHe^{-1}</math> also equals <math>H</math>. This has index <math>1</math> in both <math>H</math> and <math>eHe^{-1}</math>, which is finite.</toggledisplay>
| 12 || <math>(H \cap g_1Hg_1^{-1}) \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> has finite index in <math>\! (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> || Fact (3) || || Steps (6)(ii), (11)(ii) || <toggledisplay>Combine Steps (11)(ii) and (6)(ii) with Fact (4) for the chain <math>(H \cap g_1Hg_1^{-1}) \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1} \le g_1Hg_1^{-1} \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1} \le (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>.</toggledisplay>
|-
|-
| 2 || If <math>g \in K</math>, then <math>g^{-1} \in K</math> || <toggledisplay>Consider the map <math>\sigma:G \to G</math> given by <math>x \mapsto g^{-1}xg</math>. This is an inner automorphism of <math>G</math>, and hence preserves intersections and the index of subgroups. We have <math>\sigma(H) = g^{-1}Hg</math> and <math>\sigma(gHg^{-1}) = H</math>. Thus, we get <math>\sigma(H \cap gHg^{-1}) = g^{-1}Hg \cap H</math>. Since the index of <math>H \cap gHg^{-1}</math> in both <math>H</math> and <math>gHg^{-1}</math> is finite, so is the index of <math>\sigma(H \cap gHg^{-1}) = g^{-1}Hg \cap H</math> in both <math>\sigma(H) = g^{-1}Hg</math> and <math>\sigma(gHg^{-1}) = H</math>.</toggledisplay>
| 13 || <math>H \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> has finite index in <math>\! (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> || Fact (3) || || Step (12) || <toggledisplay>Follows from Step (12), when we note that <math>H \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> is an intermediate subgroup between <math>(H \cap g_1Hg_1^{-1}) \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> and <math>(g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>.</toggledisplay>
|-
|-
| 3 || If <math>g_1,g_2 \in K</math>, then <math>g_1g_2 \in K</math>. || {{fillin}}
| 14 || <math>g_1g_2 \in K</math>, i.e., <math>H \cap (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math> has finite index in both <math>H</math> and <math>\! (g_1g_2)H(g_1g_2)^{-1}</math>. || || || Steps (10), (13) || Step-combination direct.
|}
|}

Latest revision as of 23:28, 29 April 2022

Statement

Suppose H is a subgroup of a group G. Consider the commensurator K of H in G, defined as the set of all gG such that HgHg1 is a subgroup of finite index in both H and gHg1, i.e., H and gHg1 are commensurable subgroups. Then, K is a subgroup of G.

Facts used

  1. Group acts as automorphisms by conjugation
  2. Index satisfies transfer inequality
  3. Index is multiplicative

Proof

This proof uses a tabular format for presentation. Provide feedback on tabular proof formats in a survey (opens in new window/tab) | Learn more about tabular proof formats|View all pages on facts with proofs in tabular format

Given: A group G, a subgroup H of G. K is the set of all gG such that HgHg1 has finite index in both H and gHg1.

To prove: K is a subgroup of G.

Proof:

Proof for identity element

Let e denote the identity element of G. We have eHe1=H, so the intersection HeHe1 also equals H. This has index 1 in both H and eHe1, which is finite.

Proof for inverses

Additional given: gK. In other words, HgHg1 has finite index in both H and gHg1.

To prove: g1K, i.e., Hg1Hg has finite index in both H and g1Hg.

Proof

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 Consider the map σ:GG given by σ(x):=g1xg. This is an inner automorphism of G Fact (1) -- --
2 σ preserves intersections and index of subgroups Follows from definition of automorphism Step (1)
3 σ(H)=g1Hg and σ(gHg1)=H. Step (1)
4 σ(HgHg1)=g1HgH. Steps (2), (3)
5 HgHg1 has finite index in both H and gHg1. gK, the commensurator of H.
6 σ(HgHg1)=g1HgH has finite index in both σ(H)=g1Hg and σ(gHg1)=H. Steps (2), (3), (4), (5) [SHOW MORE]
7 g1 is in K. definition of K Step (6) Step-definition direct.

Proof for products

Additional given: g1,g2K

To prove: g1g2K, i.e., H(g1g2)H(g1g2)1 has finite index in both H and in (g1g2)H(g1g2)1.

Proof:

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 Consider the map τ:GG given by τ(x)=g1xg11. Then, τ is an inner automorphism and in particular an automorphism of G. Fact (1)
2 τ preserves intersections and index of subgroups follows from definition of automorphism Step (1)
3 τ(H)=g1Hg11 and τ(g2Hg21)=g1g2Hg21g11=(g1g2)H(g1g2)1. Step (1)
4 τ(Hg2Hg21)=g1Hg11(g1g2)H(g1g2)1. Steps (2), (3)
5 Hg2Hg21 has finite index in both H and g2Hg21. g2K, definition of K Given-direct
6 g1Hg11(g1g2)H(g1g2)1 has finite index in (i) g1Hg11 and (ii) (g1g2)H(g1g2)1. Steps (2), (3), (4), (5) [SHOW MORE]
7 H(g1Hg11(g1g2)H(g1g2)1) has finite index in (i) Hg1Hg11 and (ii) H(g1g2)H(g1g2)1. Fact (2) Step (6) [SHOW MORE]
8 Hg1Hg11 has finite index in (i) H and in (ii) g1Hg11 g1K, definition of K Given-direct
9 H(g1Hg11(g1g2)H(g1g2)1) has finite index in H. Fact (3) Steps (7)(i), (8)(i) [SHOW MORE]
10 H(g1g2)H(g1g2)1 has finite index in H Fact (3) Step (9) [SHOW MORE]
11 (Hg1Hg11)(g1g2)H(g1g2)1 has finite index in (i) H(g1g2)H(g1g2)1 and (ii) g1Hg11(g1g2)H(g1g2)1 Fact (2) Step (8) [SHOW MORE]
12 (Hg1Hg11)(g1g2)H(g1g2)1 has finite index in (g1g2)H(g1g2)1 Fact (3) Steps (6)(ii), (11)(ii) [SHOW MORE]
13 H(g1g2)H(g1g2)1 has finite index in (g1g2)H(g1g2)1 Fact (3) Step (12) [SHOW MORE]
14 g1g2K, i.e., H(g1g2)H(g1g2)1 has finite index in both H and (g1g2)H(g1g2)1. Steps (10), (13) Step-combination direct.