Congruence condition on Sylow numbers: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
 
Line 7: Line 7:
==Statement==
==Statement==


Let <math>G</math> be a [[finite group]] and <math>p</math> a prime. Let <math>n_p</math> be the <math>p</math>-[[fact about::Sylow number]] of <math>G</math>, i.e., the number of <math>p</math>-[[fact about::Sylow subgroup]]s of <math>G</math>. Then:
Let <math>G</math> be a [[finite group]] and <math>p</math> a prime. Let <math>n_p</math> be the <math>p</math>-[[fact about::Sylow number;1| ]][[Sylow number]] of <math>G</math>, i.e., the number of <math>p</math>-[[fact about::Sylow subgroup;1| ]][[Sylow subgroup]]s of <math>G</math>. Then:


<math>n_p \equiv 1 \mod p</math>.
<math>n_p \equiv 1 \mod p</math>.

Latest revision as of 14:49, 29 September 2011

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a constraint on numerical invariants that can be associated with a finite group

This article describes a congruence condition on an enumeration, or a count. It says that in a finite group and modulo prime number, the number of Sylow subgroups, i.e., the number of subgroups of prime power order whose index is relatively prime to the order satisfies a congruence condition.
View other congruence conditions | View divisor relations

Statement

Let G be a finite group and p a prime. Let np be the p-Sylow number of G, i.e., the number of p-Sylow subgroups of G. Then:

np1modp.

Since all the p-Sylow subgroups are conjugate, np equals the index of any p-Sylow subgroup. Thus, this is equivalent to the following: if P is a p-Sylow subgroup:

[G:NG(P)]1modp.

Related facts

Other parts of Sylow's theorem

np|m.

This fact is often used along with the congruence condition on Sylow numbers.

Generalizations

Converse

A converse of sorts might be: whenever a is a natural number such that a1modp, there exists a finite group G such that np=a, i.e., a is the number of p-Sylow subgroups of G.

This is false. However, some partial converses are true:

Applications

Proof

This proof assumes that we already know that there exist p-Sylow subgroups of G.