Extensible automorphism-invariant equals normal: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subgroup | {{definition equivalence|normal subgroup}} | ||
==Statement== | |||
The following are equivalent for a subgroup of a group: | |||
* The subgroup is a [[normal subgroup]]: it is invariant under all [[inner automorphism]]s of the whole group. | |||
* The subgroup is an '''extensible automorphism-invariant subgroup''': it is invariant under all [[extensible automorphism]]s of the whole group. | |||
== | ==Facts used== | ||
# [[uses::Inner implies extensible]] | |||
# [[uses::Extensible implies normal]] | |||
==Proof== | |||
=== | ===Conceptual proof using function restriction expressions=== | ||
{{fillin}} | |||
Latest revision as of 23:41, 10 October 2008
This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term normal subgroup
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions
Statement
The following are equivalent for a subgroup of a group:
- The subgroup is a normal subgroup: it is invariant under all inner automorphisms of the whole group.
- The subgroup is an extensible automorphism-invariant subgroup: it is invariant under all extensible automorphisms of the whole group.
Facts used
Proof
Conceptual proof using function restriction expressions
PLACEHOLDER FOR INFORMATION TO BE FILLED IN: [SHOW MORE]