Sufficiency of subgroup criterion: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{basic fact}} | {{basic fact}} | ||
{{definition equivalence| | {{definition equivalence|subgroup}} | ||
<section begin=main/> | |||
==Statement== | ==Statement== | ||
For a [[subset of a group|subset]] <math>H</math> of a group <math>G</math>, the following are equivalent: | For a [[subset of a group|subset]] <math>H</math> of a group <math>G</math>, the following are equivalent: | ||
# <math>H</math> is a subgroup, viz <math>H</math> is closed under the binary operation of multiplication, the inverse map, and contains the identity element | |||
# <math>H</math> is a nonempty set closed under [[left quotient of elements]] (that is, for any <math>a, b</math> in <math>H</math>, <math>b^{-1}a</math> is also in <math>H</math>) | |||
# <math>H</math> is a nonempty set closed under [[right quotient of elements]] (that is, for any <math>a, b</math> in <math>H</math>, <math>ab^{-1}</math> is also in <math>H</math>) | |||
==Proof== | ==Proof== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
We shall here prove the equivalence of the first two conditions. Equivalence of the first and third conditions follows by analogous reasoning. | We shall here prove the equivalence of the first two conditions. Equivalence of the first and third conditions follows by analogous reasoning. | ||
=== | ===(1) implies (2)=== | ||
Clearly, if <math>H</math> is a subgroup: | Clearly, if <math>H</math> is a subgroup: | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
* Whenever <math>a, b</math> are in <math>H</math> so is <math>b^{-1}</math> and hence <math>b^{-1}a</math> | * Whenever <math>a, b</math> are in <math>H</math> so is <math>b^{-1}</math> and hence <math>b^{-1}a</math> | ||
=== | ===(2) implies (1)=== | ||
Suppose <math>H</math> is a nonempty subset closed under left quotient of elements. Then, pick an element <math> | Suppose <math>H</math> is a nonempty subset closed under left quotient of elements. Then, pick an element <math>u</math> from <math>H</math>. ('''VIDEO WARNING''': In the embeddded video, the letter <math>a</math> is used in place of <math>u</math>, which is a little unwise, but the spirit of reasoning is the same). | ||
* <math>a^{-1} | * <math>e</math> is in <math>H</math>: Set <math>a = b = u</math> to get <math>u^{-1}u</math> is contained in <math>H</math>, hence <math>e</math> is in <math>H</math> | ||
* Now that <math>e</math> is in <math>H</math>, <math>a^{-1}e</math> is also in <math>H</math>, so <math> | * <math>g \in H \implies g^{-1} \in H</math>: Now that <math>e</math> is in <math>H</math>, set <math>b = g, a =e </math> to get <math>b^{-1}a = g^{-1}e</math> is also in <math>H</math>, so <math>g^{-1}</math> is in <math>H</math> | ||
* | * <math>x,y \in H \implies xy \in H</math>: Set <math>a = y, b= x^{-1}</math>. The previous step tells us both are in <math>H</math>. So <math>b^{-1}a = (x^{-1})^{-1}y</math> is in <math>H</math>, which tells us that <math>xy</math> is in <math>H</math>. | ||
Thus, <math>H</math> satisfies all the three conditions to be a subgroup. | Thus, <math>H</math> satisfies all the three conditions to be a subgroup. | ||
<section end=main/> | |||
Latest revision as of 19:43, 31 March 2022
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in group theory.
View a complete list of basic facts in group theory
VIEW FACTS USING THIS: directly | directly or indirectly, upto two steps | directly or indirectly, upto three steps|
VIEW: Survey articles about this
This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term subgroup
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions
Statement
For a subset of a group , the following are equivalent:
- is a subgroup, viz is closed under the binary operation of multiplication, the inverse map, and contains the identity element
- is a nonempty set closed under left quotient of elements (that is, for any in , is also in )
- is a nonempty set closed under right quotient of elements (that is, for any in , is also in )
Proof
We shall here prove the equivalence of the first two conditions. Equivalence of the first and third conditions follows by analogous reasoning.
(1) implies (2)
Clearly, if is a subgroup:
- is nonempty since contains the identity element
- Whenever are in so is and hence
(2) implies (1)
Suppose is a nonempty subset closed under left quotient of elements. Then, pick an element from . (VIDEO WARNING: In the embeddded video, the letter is used in place of , which is a little unwise, but the spirit of reasoning is the same).
- is in : Set to get is contained in , hence is in
- : Now that is in , set to get is also in , so is in
- : Set . The previous step tells us both are in . So is in , which tells us that is in .
Thus, satisfies all the three conditions to be a subgroup.