Sufficiency of subgroup criterion: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 27: Line 27:


* <math>e</math> is in <math>H</math>: Set <math>a = b = u</math> to get <math>u^{-1}u</math> is contained in <math>H</math>, hence <math>e</math> is in <math>H</math>  
* <math>e</math> is in <math>H</math>: Set <math>a = b = u</math> to get <math>u^{-1}u</math> is contained in <math>H</math>, hence <math>e</math> is in <math>H</math>  
* <math>x \in H \implies x^{-1} \in H</math>: Now that <math>e</math> is in <math>H</math>, set <math>b = x, a =e </math> to get <math>b^{-1}a = x^{-1}e</math> is also in <math>H</math>, so <math>x^{-1}</math> is in <math>H</math>
* <math>g \in H \implies g^{-1} \in H</math>: Now that <math>e</math> is in <math>H</math>, set <math>b = g, a =e </math> to get <math>b^{-1}a = g^{-1}e</math> is also in <math>H</math>, so <math>g^{-1}</math> is in <math>H</math>
* <math>x,y \in H \implies xy \in H</math>: Set <math>a = y, b= x^{-1}</math>. The previous step tells us both are in <math>H</math>. So <math>b^{-1}a = (x^{-1})^{-1}y</math> is in <math>H</math>, which tells us that <math>xy</math> is in <math>H</math>.
* <math>x,y \in H \implies xy \in H</math>: Set <math>a = y, b= x^{-1}</math>. The previous step tells us both are in <math>H</math>. So <math>b^{-1}a = (x^{-1})^{-1}y</math> is in <math>H</math>, which tells us that <math>xy</math> is in <math>H</math>.


Thus, <math>H</math> satisfies all the three conditions to be a subgroup.
Thus, <math>H</math> satisfies all the three conditions to be a subgroup.
<section end=main/>
<section end=main/>

Latest revision as of 19:43, 31 March 2022

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in group theory.
View a complete list of basic facts in group theory
VIEW FACTS USING THIS: directly | directly or indirectly, upto two steps | directly or indirectly, upto three steps|
VIEW: Survey articles about this

This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term subgroup
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions

Statement

For a subset of a group , the following are equivalent:

  1. is a subgroup, viz is closed under the binary operation of multiplication, the inverse map, and contains the identity element
  2. is a nonempty set closed under left quotient of elements (that is, for any in , is also in )
  3. is a nonempty set closed under right quotient of elements (that is, for any in , is also in )

Proof

We shall here prove the equivalence of the first two conditions. Equivalence of the first and third conditions follows by analogous reasoning.

(1) implies (2)

Clearly, if is a subgroup:

  • is nonempty since contains the identity element
  • Whenever are in so is and hence

(2) implies (1)

Suppose is a nonempty subset closed under left quotient of elements. Then, pick an element from . (VIDEO WARNING: In the embeddded video, the letter is used in place of , which is a little unwise, but the spirit of reasoning is the same).

  • is in : Set to get is contained in , hence is in
  • : Now that is in , set to get is also in , so is in
  • : Set . The previous step tells us both are in . So is in , which tells us that is in .

Thus, satisfies all the three conditions to be a subgroup.