Finite NPC theorem: Difference between revisions

From Groupprops
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Statement==
==Statement==


Suppose <math>K</math> is a [[finite group]] and <math>H</math> is a [[normal subgroup]] of <math>K</math>. Then, there exists a [[finite group]] <math>G</math> containing <math>K</math> such that <math>H</math> is a [[characteristic subgroup]] of <math>G</math>.
Suppose <math>G</math> is a [[finite group]] and <math>H</math> is a [[normal subgroup]] of <math>G</math>. Then, there exists a [[finite group]] <math>K</math> containing <math>G</math> such that <math>H</math> is a [[characteristic subgroup]] of <math>K</math>.


==Related facts==
==Related facts==


===Other facts about potentially characteristic subgroups===
===Related facts about potentially characteristic subgroups with similar proofs===
 
* [[Normal equals potentially characteristic]]: The general version of the result.
* [[Finite NIPC theorem]]: An analogous results for quotients/images (finite group version).
* [[Normal equals image-potentially characteristic]]: An analogous results for quotients/images (general version).
 
===Other related facts about potentially characteristic subgroups===


* [[Finite normal implies potentially characteristic]]
* [[Central implies potentially characteristic]]
* [[Central implies potentially verbal in finite]]
* [[Central implies potentially verbal in finite]]


Line 18: Line 22:


* [[Normal not implies normal-extensible automorphism-invariant in finite]]
* [[Normal not implies normal-extensible automorphism-invariant in finite]]
* [[Normal not implies semi-strongly potentially characteristic]]: If <math>H</math> is a normal subgroup of a finite group <math>K</math>, it is ''not'' necessary that there exists a group <math>G</math> containing <math>K</math> as a normal subgroup and <math>H</math> as a characteristic subgroup.
* [[Normal not implies normal-potentially characteristic]]: If <math>H</math> is a normal subgroup of a finite group <math>G</math>, it is ''not'' necessary that there exists a group <math>K</math> containing <math>G</math> as a normal subgroup and <math>H</math> as a characteristic subgroup.


==Facts used==
==Facts used==
Line 30: Line 34:
==Proof==
==Proof==


'''Given''': A finite group <math>K</math>, a normal subgroup <math>H</math> of <math>K</math>.
'''Given''': A finite group <math>G</math>, a normal subgroup <math>H</math> of <math>G</math>.


'''To prove''': There exists a group <math>G</math> containing <math>K</math> such that <math>H</math> is characteristic in <math>G</math>.
'''To prove''': There exists a group <math>K</math> containing <math>G</math> such that <math>H</math> is characteristic in <math>K</math>.


'''Proof''':
'''Proof''':


# Let <math>L = K/H</math>. Suppose <math>p</math> is a prime not dividing the order of <math>K</math>. By fact (1), <math>L</math> is a subgroup of the symmetric group <math>\operatorname{Sym}(L)</math>, which in turn can be embedded in the general linear group <math>GL(n,p)</math> where <math>n = |L|</math>. Thus, <math>L</math> has a faithful representation on a vector space <math>V</math> of dimension <math>n</math> over the prime field of order <math>p</math>.
# Let <math>L = G/H</math>. Suppose <math>p</math> is a prime not dividing the order of <math>G</math>. By fact (1), <math>L</math> is a subgroup of the symmetric group <math>\operatorname{Sym}(L)</math>, which in turn can be embedded in the general linear group <math>GL(n,p)</math> where <math>n = |L|</math>. Thus, <math>L</math> has a faithful representation on a vector space <math>V</math> of dimension <math>n</math> over the prime field of order <math>p</math>.
# Since <math>L = K/H</math>, a faithful representation of <math>L</math> on <math>V</math> gives a representation of <math>K</math> on <math>V</math> whose kernel is <math>H</math>. Let <math>G</math> be the semidirect product <math>V \rtimes K</math> for this action.
# Since <math>L = G/H</math>, a faithful representation of <math>L</math> on <math>V</math> gives a representation of <math>G</math> on <math>V</math> whose kernel is <math>H</math>. Let <math>K</math> be the semidirect product <math>V \rtimes G</math> for this action. We can also think of <math>K</math> as a [[wreath product]] of the [[group of prime order]] <math>p</math> by <math>G</math> for this action.
# <math>V</math> is characteristic in <math>G</math>: In fact, <math>V</math> is a normal <math>p</math>-Sylow subgroup, and hence is characteristic (fact (2)) (it can be defined as the set of all elements whose order is a power of <math>p</math>).
# <math>V</math> is characteristic in <math>K</math>: In fact, <math>V</math> is a normal <math>p</math>-Sylow subgroup, and hence is characteristic (fact (2)) (it can be defined as the set of all elements whose order is a power of <math>p</math>).
# <math>C_G(V)</math> is characteristic in <math>G</math>: This follows from the previous step and fact (3).
# <math>C_K(V)</math> is characteristic in <math>K</math>: This follows from the previous step and fact (3).
# <math>C_G(V) = V \times H</math>: Since <math>V</math> is abelian, the quotient group <math>G/V</math> acts on <math>V</math>; in particular, any two elements in the same coset of <math>V</math> have the same action by conjugation on <math>V</math>. Thus, the centralizer of <math>V</math> comprises those cosets of <math>V</math> for which the corresponding element of <math>G</math> fixes <math>V</math>. This is precisely the cosets of elements of <math>H</math>. Thus, <math>C_G(V) = V \rtimes H</math>. Since the action is trivial, <math>C_G(V) = V \times H</math>.
# <math>C_K(V) = V \times H</math>: Since <math>V</math> is abelian, the quotient group <math>K/V \cong G</math> acts on <math>V</math> (fact (4)); in particular, any two elements in the same coset of <math>V</math> have the same action by conjugation on <math>V</math>. Thus, the centralizer of <math>V</math> comprises those cosets of <math>V</math> for which the corresponding element of <math>G</math> fixes <math>V</math>. This is precisely the cosets of elements of <math>H</math>. Thus, <math>C_K(V) = V \rtimes H</math>. Since the action is trivial, <math>C_K(V) = V \times H</math>.
# <math>H</math> is characteristic in <math>V \times H</math>: <math>H</math> is a normal subgroup of <math>V \times H</math>, on account of being a direct factor. Further, it is a normal <math>p'</math>-Hall subgroup, so by fact (2), it is characteristic in <math>V \times H</math>.
# <math>H</math> is characteristic in <math>V \times H</math>: <math>H</math> is a normal subgroup of <math>V \times H</math>, on account of being a direct factor. Further, it is a normal <math>p'</math>-Hall subgroup, so by fact (2), it is characteristic in <math>V \times H</math>.
# <math>H</math> is characteristic in <math>G</math>: By steps (4) and (5), <math>V \times H</math> is characteristic in <math>G</math>, and by step (6), <math>H</math> is characteristic in <math>V \times H</math>. Thus, by fact (5), <math>H</math> is characteristic in <math>G</math>.
# <math>H</math> is characteristic in <math>K</math>: By steps (4) and (5), <math>V \times H</math> is characteristic in <math>K</math>, and by step (6), <math>H</math> is characteristic in <math>V \times H</math>. Thus, by fact (5), <math>H</math> is characteristic in <math>K</math>.

Latest revision as of 18:25, 9 January 2017

Statement

Suppose is a finite group and is a normal subgroup of . Then, there exists a finite group containing such that is a characteristic subgroup of .

Related facts

Related facts about potentially characteristic subgroups with similar proofs

Other related facts about potentially characteristic subgroups

Analogous facts for image-potentially characteristic subgroups

Breakdown of stronger facts

Facts used

  1. Cayley's theorem
  2. Normal Hall implies characteristic
  3. Characteristicity is centralizer-closed
  4. Quotient group acts on abelian normal subgroup
  5. Characteristicity is transitive

Proof

Given: A finite group , a normal subgroup of .

To prove: There exists a group containing such that is characteristic in .

Proof:

  1. Let . Suppose is a prime not dividing the order of . By fact (1), is a subgroup of the symmetric group , which in turn can be embedded in the general linear group where . Thus, has a faithful representation on a vector space of dimension over the prime field of order .
  2. Since , a faithful representation of on gives a representation of on whose kernel is . Let be the semidirect product for this action. We can also think of as a wreath product of the group of prime order by for this action.
  3. is characteristic in : In fact, is a normal -Sylow subgroup, and hence is characteristic (fact (2)) (it can be defined as the set of all elements whose order is a power of ).
  4. is characteristic in : This follows from the previous step and fact (3).
  5. : Since is abelian, the quotient group acts on (fact (4)); in particular, any two elements in the same coset of have the same action by conjugation on . Thus, the centralizer of comprises those cosets of for which the corresponding element of fixes . This is precisely the cosets of elements of . Thus, . Since the action is trivial, .
  6. is characteristic in : is a normal subgroup of , on account of being a direct factor. Further, it is a normal -Hall subgroup, so by fact (2), it is characteristic in .
  7. is characteristic in : By steps (4) and (5), is characteristic in , and by step (6), is characteristic in . Thus, by fact (5), is characteristic in .