Finite NPC theorem: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Proof) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Statement== | ==Statement== | ||
Suppose <math> | Suppose <math>G</math> is a [[finite group]] and <math>H</math> is a [[normal subgroup]] of <math>G</math>. Then, there exists a [[finite group]] <math>K</math> containing <math>G</math> such that <math>H</math> is a [[characteristic subgroup]] of <math>K</math>. | ||
==Related facts== | ==Related facts== | ||
===Other facts about potentially characteristic subgroups=== | ===Related facts about potentially characteristic subgroups with similar proofs=== | ||
* [[Normal equals potentially characteristic]]: The general version of the result. | |||
* [[Finite NIPC theorem]]: An analogous results for quotients/images (finite group version). | |||
* [[Normal equals image-potentially characteristic]]: An analogous results for quotients/images (general version). | |||
===Other related facts about potentially characteristic subgroups=== | |||
* [[Central implies potentially verbal in finite]] | * [[Central implies potentially verbal in finite]] | ||
| Line 18: | Line 22: | ||
* [[Normal not implies normal-extensible automorphism-invariant in finite]] | * [[Normal not implies normal-extensible automorphism-invariant in finite]] | ||
* [[Normal not implies | * [[Normal not implies normal-potentially characteristic]]: If <math>H</math> is a normal subgroup of a finite group <math>G</math>, it is ''not'' necessary that there exists a group <math>K</math> containing <math>G</math> as a normal subgroup and <math>H</math> as a characteristic subgroup. | ||
==Facts used== | ==Facts used== | ||
| Line 30: | Line 34: | ||
==Proof== | ==Proof== | ||
'''Given''': A finite group <math> | '''Given''': A finite group <math>G</math>, a normal subgroup <math>H</math> of <math>G</math>. | ||
'''To prove''': There exists a group <math> | '''To prove''': There exists a group <math>K</math> containing <math>G</math> such that <math>H</math> is characteristic in <math>K</math>. | ||
'''Proof''': | '''Proof''': | ||
# Let <math>L = | # Let <math>L = G/H</math>. Suppose <math>p</math> is a prime not dividing the order of <math>G</math>. By fact (1), <math>L</math> is a subgroup of the symmetric group <math>\operatorname{Sym}(L)</math>, which in turn can be embedded in the general linear group <math>GL(n,p)</math> where <math>n = |L|</math>. Thus, <math>L</math> has a faithful representation on a vector space <math>V</math> of dimension <math>n</math> over the prime field of order <math>p</math>. | ||
# Since <math>L = | # Since <math>L = G/H</math>, a faithful representation of <math>L</math> on <math>V</math> gives a representation of <math>G</math> on <math>V</math> whose kernel is <math>H</math>. Let <math>K</math> be the semidirect product <math>V \rtimes G</math> for this action. We can also think of <math>K</math> as a [[wreath product]] of the [[group of prime order]] <math>p</math> by <math>G</math> for this action. | ||
# <math>V</math> is characteristic in <math> | # <math>V</math> is characteristic in <math>K</math>: In fact, <math>V</math> is a normal <math>p</math>-Sylow subgroup, and hence is characteristic (fact (2)) (it can be defined as the set of all elements whose order is a power of <math>p</math>). | ||
# <math> | # <math>C_K(V)</math> is characteristic in <math>K</math>: This follows from the previous step and fact (3). | ||
# <math> | # <math>C_K(V) = V \times H</math>: Since <math>V</math> is abelian, the quotient group <math>K/V \cong G</math> acts on <math>V</math> (fact (4)); in particular, any two elements in the same coset of <math>V</math> have the same action by conjugation on <math>V</math>. Thus, the centralizer of <math>V</math> comprises those cosets of <math>V</math> for which the corresponding element of <math>G</math> fixes <math>V</math>. This is precisely the cosets of elements of <math>H</math>. Thus, <math>C_K(V) = V \rtimes H</math>. Since the action is trivial, <math>C_K(V) = V \times H</math>. | ||
# <math>H</math> is characteristic in <math>V \times H</math>: <math>H</math> is a normal subgroup of <math>V \times H</math>, on account of being a direct factor. Further, it is a normal <math>p'</math>-Hall subgroup, so by fact (2), it is characteristic in <math>V \times H</math>. | # <math>H</math> is characteristic in <math>V \times H</math>: <math>H</math> is a normal subgroup of <math>V \times H</math>, on account of being a direct factor. Further, it is a normal <math>p'</math>-Hall subgroup, so by fact (2), it is characteristic in <math>V \times H</math>. | ||
# <math>H</math> is characteristic in <math> | # <math>H</math> is characteristic in <math>K</math>: By steps (4) and (5), <math>V \times H</math> is characteristic in <math>K</math>, and by step (6), <math>H</math> is characteristic in <math>V \times H</math>. Thus, by fact (5), <math>H</math> is characteristic in <math>K</math>. | ||
Latest revision as of 18:25, 9 January 2017
Statement
Suppose is a finite group and is a normal subgroup of . Then, there exists a finite group containing such that is a characteristic subgroup of .
Related facts
Related facts about potentially characteristic subgroups with similar proofs
- Normal equals potentially characteristic: The general version of the result.
- Finite NIPC theorem: An analogous results for quotients/images (finite group version).
- Normal equals image-potentially characteristic: An analogous results for quotients/images (general version).
Analogous facts for image-potentially characteristic subgroups
- Finite NIPC theorem: Analogous statement for images; the proof uses the same construction.
Breakdown of stronger facts
- Normal not implies normal-extensible automorphism-invariant in finite
- Normal not implies normal-potentially characteristic: If is a normal subgroup of a finite group , it is not necessary that there exists a group containing as a normal subgroup and as a characteristic subgroup.
Facts used
- Cayley's theorem
- Normal Hall implies characteristic
- Characteristicity is centralizer-closed
- Quotient group acts on abelian normal subgroup
- Characteristicity is transitive
Proof
Given: A finite group , a normal subgroup of .
To prove: There exists a group containing such that is characteristic in .
Proof:
- Let . Suppose is a prime not dividing the order of . By fact (1), is a subgroup of the symmetric group , which in turn can be embedded in the general linear group where . Thus, has a faithful representation on a vector space of dimension over the prime field of order .
- Since , a faithful representation of on gives a representation of on whose kernel is . Let be the semidirect product for this action. We can also think of as a wreath product of the group of prime order by for this action.
- is characteristic in : In fact, is a normal -Sylow subgroup, and hence is characteristic (fact (2)) (it can be defined as the set of all elements whose order is a power of ).
- is characteristic in : This follows from the previous step and fact (3).
- : Since is abelian, the quotient group acts on (fact (4)); in particular, any two elements in the same coset of have the same action by conjugation on . Thus, the centralizer of comprises those cosets of for which the corresponding element of fixes . This is precisely the cosets of elements of . Thus, . Since the action is trivial, .
- is characteristic in : is a normal subgroup of , on account of being a direct factor. Further, it is a normal -Hall subgroup, so by fact (2), it is characteristic in .
- is characteristic in : By steps (4) and (5), is characteristic in , and by step (6), is characteristic in . Thus, by fact (5), is characteristic in .