Complemented normal implies quotient-powering-invariant: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Suppose <math>G</math> is a [[group]] and <math>H</math> is a [[complemented normal subgroup]] of <math>G</math> (i.e., there exists a permutable complement to <math>H</math> in <math>G</math>, i.e., <math>G</math> is an [[internal semidirect product]] involving <math>H</math>). Then, <math>H</math> is a [[quotient-powering-invariant subgroup]] of <math>G</math>: for any [[prime number]] <math>p</math> such that <math>G</math> is [[group powered over a set of primes|powered over]] <math>p</math> (i.e., every element of <math>G</math> has a unique <math>p^{th}</math> root), <math>G/H</math> is also powered over <math>p</math>. | Suppose <math>G</math> is a [[group]] and <math>H</math> is a [[complemented normal subgroup]] of <math>G</math> (i.e., there exists a permutable complement to <math>H</math> in <math>G</math>, i.e., <math>G</math> is an [[internal semidirect product]] involving <math>H</math>). Then, <math>H</math> is a [[quotient-powering-invariant subgroup]] of <math>G</math>: for any [[prime number]] <math>p</math> such that <math>G</math> is [[group powered over a set of primes|powered over]] <math>p</math> (i.e., every element of <math>G</math> has a unique <math>p^{th}</math> root), <math>G/H</math> is also powered over <math>p</math>. | ||
==Facts used== | |||
# [[uses::Complemented normal implies endomorphism kernel]] | |||
# [[uses::Endomorphism kernel implies quotient-powering-invariant]] | |||
==Proof== | ==Proof== | ||
===Proof using given facts=== | |||
The proof follows directly from Facts (1) and (2). | |||
===Hands-on proof=== | |||
{{tabular proof format}} | {{tabular proof format}} | ||
| Line 20: | Line 31: | ||
| 2 || For <math>g \in K</math>, there exists a unique <math>x \in G</math> such that <math>x^p = g</math>. || || <math>G</math> is powered over <math>p</math>. || || | | 2 || For <math>g \in K</math>, there exists a unique <math>x \in G</math> such that <math>x^p = g</math>. || || <math>G</math> is powered over <math>p</math>. || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 3 || The <math>x</math> obtained in Step (2) is actually an element of <math>K</math>. In other words, for <math>g \in K</math>, there exists a unique <math>x \in K</math> such that <math>x^p = g</math>. So, <math>K</math> is powered over <math>p</math>. || || || | | 3 || The <math>x</math> obtained in Step (2) is actually an element of <math>K</math>. In other words, for <math>g \in K</math>, there exists a unique <math>x \in K</math> such that <math>x^p = g</math>. So, <math>K</math> is powered over <math>p</math>. || || || Steps (1), (2) || We have that <math>\varphi(x)^p = \varphi(x^p) = \varphi(g) = g</math>. Thus, <math>\varphi(x)</math> is an element whose <math>p^{th}</math> power is <math>g</math>. Since <math>x</math> is the unique element of <math>G</math> such that <math>x^p = g</math>, we must have <math>\varphi(x) = x</math>, forcing <math>x \in K</math>. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 4 || <math>G/H</math> is powered over <math>p</math>. || || || Steps (1), (3)|| Step (1) says that <math>G/H \cong K</math>. Step (3) says that <math> | | 4 || <math>G/H</math> is powered over <math>p</math>. || || || Steps (1), (3)|| Step (1) says that <math>G/H \cong K</math>. Step (3) says that <math>K</math> is powered over <math>p</math>. Thus, <math>G/H</math> is powered over <math>p</math>. | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:55, 16 February 2013
Statement
Suppose is a group and is a complemented normal subgroup of (i.e., there exists a permutable complement to in , i.e., is an internal semidirect product involving ). Then, is a quotient-powering-invariant subgroup of : for any prime number such that is powered over (i.e., every element of has a unique root), is also powered over .
Facts used
- Complemented normal implies endomorphism kernel
- Endomorphism kernel implies quotient-powering-invariant
Proof
Proof using given facts
The proof follows directly from Facts (1) and (2).
Hands-on proof
This proof uses a tabular format for presentation. Provide feedback on tabular proof formats in a survey (opens in new window/tab) | Learn more about tabular proof formats|View all pages on facts with proofs in tabular format
Given: A group , a normal subgroup of with permutable complement . is powered over a prime number .
To prove: is powered over .
Proof:
| Step no. | Assertion/construction | Facts used | Given data used | Previous steps used | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Let be the retraction that sends an element of to the unique element of in its coset with respect to . This corresponds to the quotient map and . | is normal in and is complemented, with complement . | |||
| 2 | For , there exists a unique such that . | is powered over . | |||
| 3 | The obtained in Step (2) is actually an element of . In other words, for , there exists a unique such that . So, is powered over . | Steps (1), (2) | We have that . Thus, is an element whose power is . Since is the unique element of such that , we must have , forcing . | ||
| 4 | is powered over . | Steps (1), (3) | Step (1) says that . Step (3) says that is powered over . Thus, is powered over . |