Inner product of functions: Difference between revisions
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Note that <math>1/|G|</math> makes sense as an element of <math>k</math> because <math>G</math> is finite and the characteristic of <math>k</math> does not divide the order of <math>G</math>. | Note that <math>1/|G|</math> makes sense as an element of <math>k</math> because <math>G</math> is finite and the characteristic of <math>k</math> does not divide the order of <math>G</math>. | ||
===Hermitian inner product | ===Hermitian inner product=== | ||
This definition works over <math>\mathbb{C}</math> or any subfield of <math>\mathbb{C}</math> that is closed under complex conjugation. | This definition works over <math>\mathbb{C}</math> or any subfield of <math>\mathbb{C}</math> that is closed under complex conjugation. | ||
Latest revision as of 03:22, 13 July 2011
Definition
Bilinear form
This definition works in all non-modular characteristics and is bilinear.
Let be a finite group and be a field whose characteristic does not divide the order of . Given two functions , define:
Note that makes sense as an element of because is finite and the characteristic of does not divide the order of .
Hermitian inner product
This definition works over or any subfield of that is closed under complex conjugation.
Let be such a field and be a finite group. Given two functions , define:
Note that this is a Hermitian positive-definite inner product.
Relation between the definitions
First, note that the two inner products defined are not the same thing over a field where both definitions are applicable. The former is bilinear while the latter is sesquilinear and positive-definite (these qualities make it Hermitian). However, the following is true:
For a character of a representation of a finite group and an element , . See trace of inverse is complex conjugate of trace.
Thus, if we apply the inner product operation only to characters of representations, then both definitions work exactly the same way.