Weakly closed implies relatively normal: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Weakly closed implies normal in middle subgroup moved to Weakly closed implies relatively normal) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subofsubgroup property implication| | |||
stronger = weakly closed subgroup| | |||
weaker = relatively normal subgroup}} | |||
==Statement== | ==Statement== | ||
Suppose <math>H \le K \le G</math> are such that <math>H</math> is a [[fact about::weakly closed subgroup]] of <math>K</math> relative to <math>G</math>. Then, <math>H</math> is a [[fact about::normal subgroup]] of < | Suppose <math>H \le K \le G</math> are such that <math>H</math> is a [[fact about::weakly closed subgroup]] of <math>K</math> relative to <math>G</math>. Then, <math>H</math> is a [[fact about::normal subgroup]] of <math>K</math>. In other words, <math>H</math> is a [[fact about::relatively normal subgroup]] in <math>K</math> with respect to <math>G</math>. | ||
Latest revision as of 20:35, 11 February 2009
This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two subgroup-of-subgroup properties. That is, it states that every subgroup-of-subgroup satisfying the first subgroup-of-subgroup property (i.e., weakly closed subgroup) must also satisfy the second subgroup-of-subgroup property (i.e., relatively normal subgroup)
View all subgroup-of-subgroup property implications | View all subgroup-of-subgroup property non-implications
Get more facts about weakly closed subgroup|Get more facts about relatively normal subgroup
Statement
Suppose are such that is a Weakly closed subgroup (?) of relative to . Then, is a Normal subgroup (?) of . In other words, is a Relatively normal subgroup (?) in with respect to .