Three subgroup lemma: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Statement== | ==Statement== | ||
=== | ===Two out of three formulation=== | ||
Let <math>A, B, C</math> be three subgroups of <math>G</math>. Then any two of the three statements below implies the third: | Let <math>A, B, C</math> be three subgroups of <math>G</math>. Then any two of the three statements below implies the third: | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* <math>[[C,A],B]</math> is [[trivial group|trivial]] | * <math>[[C,A],B]</math> is [[trivial group|trivial]] | ||
===Any one contained in normal closure of subgroup generated by other two=== | |||
Let <math>A, B, C</math> be three subgroups of <math>G</math>. Then <math>[[A,B],C]</math> is contained in the [[normal closure]] of the subgroup generated by <math>[[B,C],A]</math> and <math>[[C,A],B]</math>. Equivalently, if <math>N</math> is a normal subgroup containing both <math>[[B,C],A]</math> and <math>[[C,A],B]</math>, then <math>N</math> contains <math>[[A,B],C]</math>. | |||
===Formulation where one is a group of automorphisms=== | |||
Let <math>G</math> be a group, <math>A,B</math> be subgroups, and <math>C \le \operatorname{Aut}(G)</math>. Then, using the notation of [[commutator of element and automorphism]], any two of the three statements below implies the third: | |||
* <math>[[A,B],C]</math> is trivial | |||
* <math>[[B,C],A]</math> is [[trivial group|trivial]] | |||
* <math>[[C,A],B]</math> is [[trivial group|trivial]] | |||
Further, <math>[[A,B],C]</math> is contained in the [[normal closure]] of the subgroup generated by <math>[[B,C],A]</math> and <math>[[C,A],B]</math>. Equivalently, if <math>N</math> is a normal subgroup containing both <math>[[B,C],A]</math> and <math>[[C,A],B]</math>, then <math>N</math> contains <math>[[A,B],C]</math>. | |||
==Proof== | ==Proof== | ||
The three subgroup lemma follows from [[Witt's identity]]. | The three subgroup lemma follows from [[Witt's identity]]. | ||
{{fillin}} | |||
==Corollaries== | ==Corollaries== | ||
| Line 22: | Line 37: | ||
This result has an analogue in the theory of [[Lie algebra]]s. | This result has an analogue in the theory of [[Lie algebra]]s. | ||
==References== | |||
===Textbook references=== | |||
* {{booklink-proved|KhukhroNGA}}, Page 31, Theorem 2.1.2 (formal statement, with proof) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:53, 7 July 2008
This fact is related to: commutator calculus
View other facts related to commutator calculus | View terms related to commutator calculus
This article describes a fact or result that is not basic but it still well-established and standard. The fact may involve terms that are themselves non-basic
View other semi-basic facts in group theory
VIEW FACTS USING THIS: directly | directly or indirectly, upto two steps | directly or indirectly, upto three steps|
VIEW: Survey articles about this
Statement
Two out of three formulation
Let be three subgroups of . Then any two of the three statements below implies the third:
Any one contained in normal closure of subgroup generated by other two
Let be three subgroups of . Then is contained in the normal closure of the subgroup generated by and . Equivalently, if is a normal subgroup containing both and , then contains .
Formulation where one is a group of automorphisms
Let be a group, be subgroups, and . Then, using the notation of commutator of element and automorphism, any two of the three statements below implies the third:
Further, is contained in the normal closure of the subgroup generated by and . Equivalently, if is a normal subgroup containing both and , then contains .
Proof
The three subgroup lemma follows from Witt's identity.
PLACEHOLDER FOR INFORMATION TO BE FILLED IN: [SHOW MORE]
Corollaries
If is a perfect group and is a subgroup of such that is trivial, then is trivial.
This result has an analogue in the theory of Lie algebras.
References
Textbook references
- Nilpotent groups and their automorphisms by Evgenii I. Khukhro, ISBN 3110136724, More info, Page 31, Theorem 2.1.2 (formal statement, with proof)