Finite supersolvable implies subgroups of all orders dividing the group order

From Groupprops
Jump to: navigation, search
This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two group properties. That is, it states that every group satisfying the first group property (i.e., finite supersolvable group) must also satisfy the second group property (i.e., group having subgroups of all orders dividing the group order)
View all group property implications | View all group property non-implications
Get more facts about finite supersolvable group|Get more facts about group having subgroups of all orders dividing the group order

Statement

Suppose is a finite supersolvable group: a finite group that is also supersolvable. Then, if is a positive divisor of the order of , has a subgroup of order .

Related facts

Similar facts

Converse

The converse of this statement is false -- we can have a non-supersolvable group that has subgroups of all orders dividing the group order. In fact, every finite solvable group can be embedded inside a group with the property. See every finite solvable group is a subgroup of a finite group having subgroups of all orders dividing the group order.

The smallest examples of non-supersolvable groups with subgroups of all orders dividing their order are symmetric group:S4 and direct product of A4 and Z2, both of order 24.

Facts used

  1. Cyclic implies every subgroup is characteristic
  2. Characteristic of normal implies normal
  3. Lagrange's theorem
  4. Supersolvability is quotient-closed
  5. Normal Hall implies permutably complemented: This is the existence part of the Schur-Zassenhaus theorem.

Proof

We prove this by induction. The base case for induction, the case of a group of order 1, is trivially true. We therefore assume that the resultis proved for all groups of order smalelr than the group we are trying to prove the result for.

Given: A finite supersolvable group of order .

To prove: For any positive divisor of , has a subgroup of order .

Proof:

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 has a cyclic normal subgroup of prime order , for some Facts (1), (2) is supersolvable of order By the definition of supersolvability, has a nontrivial cyclic normal subgroup, say . Let be a prime dividing the order of . has a subgroup of order , which by Fact (1) is characteristic in C. By Fact (2), is normal in .
2 has subgroups of every order dividing . inductive assumption By Fact (3), has order , which is strictly smaller than . Also, by Fact (4), it is supersolvable. Therefore, the inductive assumption applies, and it has subgroups of all orders dividing it.
3 If , then has a subgroup of order Steps (1), (2) Since and , we get that . Therefore, has a subgroup of order . By Fact (4), the inverse image of this in has order .
4 If does not divide , has a subgroup of order containing as a cyclic normal subgroup of order . Steps (1), (2) Since divides but does not divide , . Therefore, has a subgroup of order . By Fact (4), the inverse image of this in has order . Call this group .
5 If does not divide , has a subgroup of order . Step (4) Continuing from Step (4), is a normal Sylow subgroup of (since does not divide ). Hence, fact (5) tells us that contains a complement to , which must therefore have order .
6 In all cases, has a subgroup of order Steps (3), (5) The two cases were dealt with in steps (3) and (5).
This proof uses a tabular format for presentation. Provide feedback on tabular proof formats in a survey (opens in new window/tab) | Learn more about tabular proof formats|View all pages on facts with proofs in tabular format