Groupprops, The Group Properties Wiki (pre-alpha)
YOUR FEEDBACK IS IMPORTANT!
Please take a short user satisfaction survey about Groupprops.
Your survey responses will be helpful in improving the site experience!
Thanks in advance!
Conjugacy class of prime power order implies not simple
From Groupprops
Contents |
Statement
If a finite group contains a conjugacy class whose order is a power of a prime (and also, greater than 1), then the finite group cannot be simple.
Applications
This is used to prove that order has only two prime factors implies solvable -- the result commonly called Burnside's paqb-theorem.
Results used in proof
- Column orthogonality theorem which states that any two distinct columns in the character table of a finite group, are orthogonal.
- The fact that for any character χ over complex numbers and any
whose conjugacy class is C, the following number is an algebraic integer:
For full proof, refer: degree-class size-normalized character is algebraic integer
We shall actually use a corollary of this result, the zero-or-scalar lemma, namely:
If the size of the conjugacy class of
and the degree of a representation φ with character χ are relatively prime, then either φ(g) is a scalar matrix (where φ is the linear representation associated to χ) or χ(g) = 0.
For full proof, refer: Zero-or-scalar lemma
Proof
Let C be a conjugacy class in G of order qd where q is a prime power. Take
. Now consider the inner product of the columns for C and the identity element, in the character table. By the column orthogonality theorem, this inner product is zero, so we get:
| ∑ | χ(g)χ(1) = 0 |
| χ |
where the summation is over all irreducible characters over the complex numbers.
Now suppose G is a simple group. Clearly G is not Abelian (otherwise there would not be a conjugacy class of size greater than one). So G is a simple non-Abelian group. In particular:
- Any nontrivial representation of G is faithful
- The center of G is trivial, viz G is a centerless group
Combining these facts, φ(g) cannot be a scalar for any nontrivial linear representation φ and nontrivial element g of G.
Now suppose φ is a nontrivial irreducible representation whose degree is not a multiple of q. Then, the zero-or-scalar lemma tells us that either χ(g) = 0 or φ(g) is a scalar. φ(g) cannot be a scalar, so χ(g) = 0 whenever the degree of χ is not divisible by q.
The upshot is that the sum above transforms to:
with the sum taken over all nontrivial irreducible characters χ for which q | χ(1).
Now χ(g) is an algebraic integer for every χ so the expression under summation is an algebraic integer. Call it α. Then:
This tells us that − 1 / q is an algebraic integer, which is a contradiction.
Thus G cannot be simple.
References
Textbook references
- Abstract Algebra by David S. Dummit and Richard M. Foote, 10-digit ISBN 0471433349, 13-digit ISBN 978-0471433347, Page 890, Lemma 7, Section 19.2 (Theorems of Burnside and Hall), (The proof of this builds on lemmas and definitions ranging across pages 887-890. The proof is immediately followed by the proof of Burnside's p^aq^b-theorem.)More info
Journal references
- On groups of order pαqβ by William Burnside, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, ISSN 1460244X (online), ISSN 00246115 (print), Volume 1, Page 388 - 392(Year 1904): More info
| Page class | Fact + |
| Proved in | Book:DummitFoote (890, Lemma 7, Section 19.2 (Theorems of Burnside and Hall), The proof of this builds on lemmas and definitions ranging across pages 887-890. The proof is immediately followed by the proof of Burnside's p^aq^b-theorem.) + |
| Referenced in | Book:DummitFoote (890, Lemma 7, Section 19.2 (Theorems of Burnside and Hall), The proof of this builds on lemmas and definitions ranging across pages 887-890. The proof is immediately followed by the proof of Burnside's p^aq^b-theorem.) +, and Paper:Burnsidep^aq^b (?, ?, ?) + |
| Stated in | Book:DummitFoote (890, Lemma 7, Section 19.2 (Theorems of Burnside and Hall), The proof of this builds on lemmas and definitions ranging across pages 887-890. The proof is immediately followed by the proof of Burnside's p^aq^b-theorem.) + |

