Groupprops, The Group Properties Wiki (pre-alpha)

Conjugacy class of prime power order implies not simple

From Groupprops

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Statement

If a finite group contains a conjugacy class whose order is a power of a prime (and also, greater than 1), then the finite group cannot be simple.

Applications

This is used to prove that order has only two prime factors implies solvable -- the result commonly called Burnside's paqb-theorem.

Results used in proof

\frac{\chi(g)|C|}{\chi(1)}

For full proof, refer: degree-class size-normalized character is algebraic integer

We shall actually use a corollary of this result, the zero-or-scalar lemma, namely:

If the size of the conjugacy class of g \in G and the degree of a representation φ with character χ are relatively prime, then either φ(g) is a scalar matrix (where φ is the linear representation associated to χ) or χ(g) = 0.

For full proof, refer: Zero-or-scalar lemma

Proof

Let C be a conjugacy class in G of order qd where q is a prime power. Take g \in C. Now consider the inner product of the columns for C and the identity element, in the character table. By the column orthogonality theorem, this inner product is zero, so we get:

χ(g)χ(1) = 0
χ

where the summation is over all irreducible characters over the complex numbers.

Now suppose G is a simple group. Clearly G is not Abelian (otherwise there would not be a conjugacy class of size greater than one). So G is a simple non-Abelian group. In particular:

Combining these facts, φ(g) cannot be a scalar for any nontrivial linear representation φ and nontrivial element g of G.

Now suppose φ is a nontrivial irreducible representation whose degree is not a multiple of q. Then, the zero-or-scalar lemma tells us that either χ(g) = 0 or φ(g) is a scalar. φ(g) cannot be a scalar, so χ(g) = 0 whenever the degree of χ is not divisible by q.

The upshot is that the sum above transforms to:

1 + q\sum \chi(g)\chi(1)/q = 0

with the sum taken over all nontrivial irreducible characters χ for which q | χ(1).

Now χ(g) is an algebraic integer for every χ so the expression under summation is an algebraic integer. Call it α. Then:

1 + q\alpha = 0 \implies \alpha = -1/q

This tells us that − 1 / q is an algebraic integer, which is a contradiction.

Thus G cannot be simple.

References

Textbook references

Journal references

Facts about Conjugacy class of prime power order implies not simpleRDF feed
Page classFact  +
Proved inBook:DummitFoote (890, Lemma 7, Section 19.2 (Theorems of Burnside and Hall), The proof of this builds on lemmas and definitions ranging across pages 887-890. The proof is immediately followed by the proof of Burnside's p^aq^b-theorem.)  +
Referenced inBook:DummitFoote (890, Lemma 7, Section 19.2 (Theorems of Burnside and Hall), The proof of this builds on lemmas and definitions ranging across pages 887-890. The proof is immediately followed by the proof of Burnside's p^aq^b-theorem.)  +, and Paper:Burnsidep^aq^b (?, ?, ?)  +
Stated inBook:DummitFoote (890, Lemma 7, Section 19.2 (Theorems of Burnside and Hall), The proof of this builds on lemmas and definitions ranging across pages 887-890. The proof is immediately followed by the proof of Burnside's p^aq^b-theorem.)  +
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
lookup
Credits
Toolbox
request/feedback
subject wikis